Turns out the Land Swap was related to the CJUSD HIGH SCHOOL to be built in GT. However, the AES going ahead with the Development of the Peaker Plant is important to be informed about. These two developments and the RDA's swaping of land here and there it would be helpful if the Agenda had a Map attached, and the purpose of the Land Swap Identified.
YOU SHOULD KNOW WHAT IS IN THESE DOCUMENTS. JUDGE FOR YOURSELF.
[PDF] CVEC AFC QA/QC ROUTING SHEET
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTMLBernardino County (including Grand Terrace) by the Santa Ana RWQCB on April ... Property generally flows to the west toward the Cage Park Property pond or ...www.energy.ca.gov/.../applicant/AFC_CD-ROM/ Volume_01_AES_Highgrove_Project_AFC/8.14%20Water%20Resources.pdf
- Similar pages
[PDF] SECTION 4
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTMLCAGE PARK PROPERTY. IS032006003RDD_13 (5/22/06). FIGURE 2.2-5. CONSTRUCTION PARKING. AND LAYDOWN AREA. AES HIGHGROVE. GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA ...www.energy.ca.gov/.../AFC_CD-ROM/Volume_ 01_AES_Highgrove_Project_AFC/2.0%20Project%20Description.pdf - Similar pages[ More results from www.energy.ca.gov ]
Wednesday, July 05, 2006
Planning Meeting Agenda Posted July 5th for July 6th Meeting.
ALERT
AGENDA
THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE WILL BE HELD ON
DATE: July 6, 2006
PLACE: Council Chambers, Grand Terrace Civic Center
22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, California
7:00 P.M. CONVENE SITE AND ARCHITECTURE REVIEW BOARD/
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
• Call to Order
• Pledge of Allegiance
• Roll Call
• Public address to Commission shall be limited to three minutes unless extended by the Chairman. Should you desire to make a longer presentation, please make written request to be agendized to the Director of Community and Economic Development.
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION:
• This is a time for anyone in the audience to speak on any item, which is not on the agenda for this meeting.
ITEMS:
1. Summary Vacation of a Summary Vacation of a Portion of Pico Street,
Portion of Pico Street, E-06-10
E-06-10
APPLICANT: City of Grand Terrace
LOCATION: Pico Street between Pico Park and the Union Pacific Rail Line east of Taylor Street.
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend that the City Council approve the summary vacation of Pico Street between Pico Park and the Union Pacific Rail Line east of Taylor Street.
2. SA-06-05, CUP-06-03 SA-06-05, CUP-06-03 and E-06-06 to construct
& E-06-06 a wireless telecommunications facility. The facility will consist of 6 panel antennas mounted 33 feet high, screened inside of a 35 foot tower that will be attached to the north east corner of Robinson Hall at Christ the Redeemer Catholic Church.
APPLICANT: Omnipoint Communications, Inc.
LOCATION: 12745 Oriole Avenue, Grand Terrace (APN# 1178-211-01)
RECOMMENDATION: Open the Public Hearing, receive testimony, close the public hearing, and approve SA-06-05 to construct a wireless telecommunications facility.
3. MINUTES Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of
April 20, 2006
RECOMMENDATION: Approval
4. MINUTES Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of
May 18, 2006
RECOMMENDATION: Approval
ADJOURN SITE AND ARCHITECTURE REVIEW BOARD/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
CONVENE PUBLIC WORKSHOP SESSION
• Information to Commissioners
• Information from Commissioners
ADJOURN PUBLIC WORKSHOP SESSION
NEXT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TO BE HELD ON JULY 20, 2006
From the Email InBox: An Unexpected Gramps Reply
Dear Gramps:
You know how JoAnn Johnson told all the seniors that they would be put on a priority list for the Blue Mt. Villas. They may be put on a list, more like a suckers list. I wondered, but not for long why Mary Silverstein changed the rating from low to moderate income to low to low low income. I went on their web site and and called all their locations. I asked if they accept H.U.D., in fact one location in Cudahy the woman in very poor English said ""no H.U.D only section 8. I told her that is H.U.D. "Oh Yeah, voucher". All their locations are section 8. How are the Seniors going to qualify unless they give everything to The Foundation of Grand Terrace.
Grampa's Reply:
I share your concerns, but has no answers to these problems. Apparently only 10 of the units will be rented at Market rate and the Rest will be for VERY LOW INCOME or Section 8 housing. Which 10 of JoAnn Johnson's Friends will be provided for and who will not. These issues of concern are because the project, funds, loans, and agreements were rushed and approved without requiring a full disclosure of the Terms and Conditions and Finances of the Project. It was given the Tom Schwab stamp of approval which then is good enough for Planning Department, Planning Commission, and of course the majority of the City Council.
I share your concerns, I am ashamed that I do not have the answers to give the other seniors. Perhaps the Judge will see this case as needing to go back to open competitive bid, a total do over.
We are where we are because the Council Members did not hear the speakers at the podium asking for full planning, disclosure, and revision of the project. Does this make me happy. No not at all. It makes me question all City Council Decisions, Motives, and Actions.
Gramps.
You know how JoAnn Johnson told all the seniors that they would be put on a priority list for the Blue Mt. Villas. They may be put on a list, more like a suckers list. I wondered, but not for long why Mary Silverstein changed the rating from low to moderate income to low to low low income. I went on their web site and and called all their locations. I asked if they accept H.U.D., in fact one location in Cudahy the woman in very poor English said ""no H.U.D only section 8. I told her that is H.U.D. "Oh Yeah, voucher". All their locations are section 8. How are the Seniors going to qualify unless they give everything to The Foundation of Grand Terrace.
Grampa's Reply:
I share your concerns, but has no answers to these problems. Apparently only 10 of the units will be rented at Market rate and the Rest will be for VERY LOW INCOME or Section 8 housing. Which 10 of JoAnn Johnson's Friends will be provided for and who will not. These issues of concern are because the project, funds, loans, and agreements were rushed and approved without requiring a full disclosure of the Terms and Conditions and Finances of the Project. It was given the Tom Schwab stamp of approval which then is good enough for Planning Department, Planning Commission, and of course the majority of the City Council.
I share your concerns, I am ashamed that I do not have the answers to give the other seniors. Perhaps the Judge will see this case as needing to go back to open competitive bid, a total do over.
We are where we are because the Council Members did not hear the speakers at the podium asking for full planning, disclosure, and revision of the project. Does this make me happy. No not at all. It makes me question all City Council Decisions, Motives, and Actions.
Gramps.
A Way to Serve Your Family and Community:
Community Emergency Response Team
C.E.R.T is looking for GT Residents
The C.E.R.T. program provides participants with "hands-on" practical training that will enable them to effectively plan for and respond to an earthquake, or other emergencies in and around their neighborhood. The Rialto Fire Department personnel will be teaching the course for Grand Terrace residents. C.E.R.T. is about readiness, people helping people, rescuer safety, and doing the greatest good for the greatest number.
The need for C.E.R.T. Teams
Local government prepares for everyday emergencies. However, during a disaster, the number and scope of incidents can overwhelm conventional emergency services. Fire and Police personnel will be unable to provide services to all those that need assistance. Community members face a tremendous responsibility for the safety and welfare of their family members day-to-day, especially in the event of an emergency. This valuable course is designed to help you protect yourself, your family, your neighbors and your neighborhood in an emergency situation.
The next series of C.E.R.T. classes will be held on Friday, July 14th and Friday, June 21st from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. at the GT Fire Station. The third class will be determined by the class members.
You must attend all sessions in order to receive a course completion certificate. Sturdy shoes are required. All other materials will be provided. Any program costs will be covered by the City of Grand Terrace, EOC fund. Call (909) 430-2201 to register.
Classes are either scheduled one per week for three weeks or one per week for six weeks. Attendance is required for all class days
Classes are open to all City of GT citizens who are at least 18 years old.
The need for C.E.R.T. Teams
Local government prepares for everyday emergencies. However, during a disaster, the number and scope of incidents can overwhelm conventional emergency services. Fire and Police personnel will be unable to provide services to all those that need assistance. Community members face a tremendous responsibility for the safety and welfare of their family members day-to-day, especially in the event of an emergency. This valuable course is designed to help you protect yourself, your family, your neighbors and your neighborhood in an emergency situation.
The next series of C.E.R.T. classes will be held on Friday, July 14th and Friday, June 21st from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. at the GT Fire Station. The third class will be determined by the class members.
You must attend all sessions in order to receive a course completion certificate. Sturdy shoes are required. All other materials will be provided. Any program costs will be covered by the City of Grand Terrace, EOC fund. Call (909) 430-2201 to register.
Classes are either scheduled one per week for three weeks or one per week for six weeks. Attendance is required for all class days
Classes are open to all City of GT citizens who are at least 18 years old.
Tuesday, July 04, 2006
Email Report of Fireworks Problems: July 4 2006
Arrests on the 4th during time of INCREASED Enforcement:
No Firework related arrests posted yet.
BOOKING NUMBER: 0607300177 DATE: 07/04/2006 TIME: 0954
ARREST DATE: 07/04/2006 TIME: 0900 LOC: 21845 GRAND TERRANCE AGENCY: GRANDTERRACE CITY
RELEASE DATE: 07/04/2006 TIME: 1321 FACILITY:
NAME: LAST: EHRLICH FIRST: ALBERT MIDDLE: PETER DOB: 06/10/1968 SEX: M
RACE: H HT: 6 00 WT: 190 HAIR: MUL EYE COLOR: BRO OCCUPATION: HANDY MAN
CHARGE TYPE SUPPL/HOLD BAIL DISPOSITION
HS11377(A) MISD ORIGINAL $40,000.00 MISD-WARRANT
PC1320(A) MISD ORIGINAL
PC853.7 MISD ORIGINAL
VC12500(A) MISD POM1PM048150 $75,000.00
VC14601.1(A) MISD POM2PM093601 $60,000.00
HS11377 (A) Possession of controlled substance
PC 1320(A) Failure to appear
PC853.7 Failure to appear
VC12500(A) Driving without driver’s license
VC14601.1(A) Driving when license suspended
BOOKING NUMBER: 0607300193 DATE: 07/05/2006 TIME: 0022
ARREST DATE: 07/04/2006 TIME: 2241 LOC: 22607 TANAGER ST AGENCY: GRANDTERRACE CITY
RELEASE DATE: TIME: FACILITY: CENTRAL D.C.
NAME: LAST: ROSENTHAL FIRST: JAMES MIDDLE: ROBERT DOB: 08/10/1979 SEX: M
RACE: W HT: 5 11 WT: 190 HAIR: BLN EYE COLOR: GRN OCCUPATION: ALIGNMENT TRH
CHARGE TYPE SUPPL/HOLD BAIL DISPOSITION
VC23152(A) MISD ORIGINAL NO BAIL
VC23152(B) MISD ORIGINAL
VC23152(A) DUI
VC23152(B) DUI over .08
Gramps:
Observed Rocket Launches were in the proximity of Holly/Mt Vernon alley south end before turn perhaps 2 or 3rd house from the turn in the alley.
Observed Rocket Launches in the area near Grand Terrace Elementary School.
Observed Rocket Launches West of Deberry and Michigan.
Observed Citizens using "Safe and Sane" fireworks in the public street. Scooters bouncing under traffic and parked cars.
Heard many dogs and cats still distressed after 12:00. Increase of howling and barking.
Observed decreased evening business trade, after 7:00.
Observed fireworks, "Safe and Sane" being used at Observation Point, Canal and Mt. Vernon near brush and dry vegetation. (including scooters on the ground).
After 12:30 am, June 5th reports of Rockets being fired in the proximity of Pico and Michigan...
Are there any official Reports of Arrests, Citations, Fires or confiscations?
How much was earned by the sports team, vs, how much did the enforcement cost, vs, how much was put to risk, and were there any injuries or damage to property from the use of Illegal, and or Safe and Sane Fireworks?
Just wonder what the real facts are?
Gramps Says:
Above comes from an accumulation of reports. No one had a report that ended with them seeing an arrest or citation. Yes there were more officers and sheriff cars, but no one reported seeing actual intervention taking place. It is reasonable, to leave a problem area, and get out of the way.
Well, it will be interesting if the full information is made available, sheriff log of calls, fire calls and citations written.
Interesting.
Monday, July 03, 2006
From the Email Inbox: "Small Group of People"
Dear Gramps:
Regarding the "Small Group of People the Council Woman Ferry suggests are interested in their own "PRIVATE INTEREST".
If there is a group it's the Petta's, Carlstrom and Schwab and the three women.
Lets review her constructive ideas.
The OAC. Hundreds of thousands or millions if you want to count the favor to Carlstrom on the Dodson house. Petta owned property there. Not marketable or feasible.
The Town Center. In her own words in a newspaper article she said she didn't want big box stores or drive through or trucks on the neighborhood streets. The Town Center which at the joint Planning, Council meeting the chambers were packed, with the majority of those that came to the podium opposed to it, were not a group, THEY ARE THE CITIZENS THAT WERE SAYING THEY DID NOT WANT IT and it fell on deaf or very ignorant ears.
Councilwoman Ferre stated in another newspaper article that she was going to vote with Jacobsen before the plans were ever presented to the Community. She is in favor of eminent domain as long as she can keep her promise from another newspaper article where she said she was going to developer more than her father did.
The Senior Center where again citizens came forward opposed to the creating a zone for the project rather than a project for the zone. Ms. Silverstein claimed that the Senior Housing would be low to moderate income. After the project contracts were signed Ms. Silverstein changed it to low to low low income. That will over qualify most of the Seniors that were led to believe that they were on a priority list.
Every project that Councilwoman Ferre voted to approve, without reading it appears, has been push through the process without abiding by the law. They have all been stopped by citizens, not groups, by lawsuits.
Even recently when two lawyers at a council meeting told Ferre that the law would not allow Essco to build she and Councilwoman Cortes pushed through a vote that resulted in a lawsuit in less than two weeks.
The High Schools, Yes I said schools, because it is two. The regular high school and the not so regular continuation high school that will be located there. At least the people being forced off their property is for a school and not a favor to a developer. Until there is a change at City Hall the three Councilwomen are going to be led by the nose by Schwab, Terra Loma Reality and Gene Carlstrom for the profit of a small group, at the cost of the taxpayer.
Regarding the "Small Group of People the Council Woman Ferry suggests are interested in their own "PRIVATE INTEREST".
If there is a group it's the Petta's, Carlstrom and Schwab and the three women.
Lets review her constructive ideas.
The OAC. Hundreds of thousands or millions if you want to count the favor to Carlstrom on the Dodson house. Petta owned property there. Not marketable or feasible.
The Town Center. In her own words in a newspaper article she said she didn't want big box stores or drive through or trucks on the neighborhood streets. The Town Center which at the joint Planning, Council meeting the chambers were packed, with the majority of those that came to the podium opposed to it, were not a group, THEY ARE THE CITIZENS THAT WERE SAYING THEY DID NOT WANT IT and it fell on deaf or very ignorant ears.
Councilwoman Ferre stated in another newspaper article that she was going to vote with Jacobsen before the plans were ever presented to the Community. She is in favor of eminent domain as long as she can keep her promise from another newspaper article where she said she was going to developer more than her father did.
The Senior Center where again citizens came forward opposed to the creating a zone for the project rather than a project for the zone. Ms. Silverstein claimed that the Senior Housing would be low to moderate income. After the project contracts were signed Ms. Silverstein changed it to low to low low income. That will over qualify most of the Seniors that were led to believe that they were on a priority list.
Every project that Councilwoman Ferre voted to approve, without reading it appears, has been push through the process without abiding by the law. They have all been stopped by citizens, not groups, by lawsuits.
Even recently when two lawyers at a council meeting told Ferre that the law would not allow Essco to build she and Councilwoman Cortes pushed through a vote that resulted in a lawsuit in less than two weeks.
The High Schools, Yes I said schools, because it is two. The regular high school and the not so regular continuation high school that will be located there. At least the people being forced off their property is for a school and not a favor to a developer. Until there is a change at City Hall the three Councilwomen are going to be led by the nose by Schwab, Terra Loma Reality and Gene Carlstrom for the profit of a small group, at the cost of the taxpayer.
http://www.pe.com/forums/profile.php?mode=register&sid=6ca68a103bc0d40dbc40f1638b41d7bc
Read the Forum judge the content of the posts be it here or any other blog.
Comming to an Agenda in the Future: Plan "B"
THE NEXT
CRA/CITY COUNCIL MEETING
WILL BE HELD ON
THURSDAY, JULY 13, 2006 AT 6:00 P.M.
*
*
AGENDA ITEM REQUESTS FOR THE 07-13-2006 MEETING MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING TO THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE BY NOON 07-06-2006.
From the Email Inbox: Recall
Dear Gramps:
Yours IS A WONDERFUL REPLY to the REPLY. I do not know all the group doing the recall, but I believe this group must aggressively issue press releases with your content. I am really disappointed with her(Council Member Ferre's) response, it tells me she is not seeing anything constructive in your groups efforts or my input for better governance in this city.
1. Programs for youth.
2. Defining the role and powers of the Mayor.
3. Holding a workshop on RDA to inform an educate residents and the Council on the full scope of RDA in our city.
CITIZENS ARE STONEWALLED AT EVERY TURN.
I still have not made a commitment to her recall, as I have to Garcia, but this is hard to stomach.
Also does this group have credible candidates to take Cortes seat and run for Mayor?
Gramps Answers:
To suggest there is a "Small Group" of people motivated by "Private Interest" is just wrong thinking all around the issue. Yes, a small group can start a recall, it will take a significant number of citizens to make it actually happen. So onward with the effort to improve the governance of Grand Terrace.
The recall is nearly at the stage of collecting signatures. This will require time and effort of people committed to better governance. This is separate to who will run for Mayor or the Council Seat of Council Persons, Cortez/Hilkey. These two seats are up for election this November. Then if the Recall happens there will be needed 2 folk to serve for 2 years to finish the terms of the recalled seats.
So in there are 4 seats for people seeking to provide better governance to the City of Grand Terrace.
No, this blog has not pre determined who this will be. Names are kicking about, toes are dangling in the waters. The Recall Petitions are our focus for now.
IF you want to help, we are near the point where the need for Registered Voters of Grand Terrace who would like to help gather signatures will be needed. Contact grandterracenews@yahoo.com and old Gramps will forward your contact information to the worker bees who are coordinating the efforts of many people and groups. There is no one single group or person taking this action.
If you want to run for office see the City Clerk for the needed papers.
Yours IS A WONDERFUL REPLY to the REPLY. I do not know all the group doing the recall, but I believe this group must aggressively issue press releases with your content. I am really disappointed with her(Council Member Ferre's) response, it tells me she is not seeing anything constructive in your groups efforts or my input for better governance in this city.
1. Programs for youth.
2. Defining the role and powers of the Mayor.
3. Holding a workshop on RDA to inform an educate residents and the Council on the full scope of RDA in our city.
CITIZENS ARE STONEWALLED AT EVERY TURN.
I still have not made a commitment to her recall, as I have to Garcia, but this is hard to stomach.
Also does this group have credible candidates to take Cortes seat and run for Mayor?
Gramps Answers:
To suggest there is a "Small Group" of people motivated by "Private Interest" is just wrong thinking all around the issue. Yes, a small group can start a recall, it will take a significant number of citizens to make it actually happen. So onward with the effort to improve the governance of Grand Terrace.
The recall is nearly at the stage of collecting signatures. This will require time and effort of people committed to better governance. This is separate to who will run for Mayor or the Council Seat of Council Persons, Cortez/Hilkey. These two seats are up for election this November. Then if the Recall happens there will be needed 2 folk to serve for 2 years to finish the terms of the recalled seats.
So in there are 4 seats for people seeking to provide better governance to the City of Grand Terrace.
No, this blog has not pre determined who this will be. Names are kicking about, toes are dangling in the waters. The Recall Petitions are our focus for now.
IF you want to help, we are near the point where the need for Registered Voters of Grand Terrace who would like to help gather signatures will be needed. Contact grandterracenews@yahoo.com and old Gramps will forward your contact information to the worker bees who are coordinating the efforts of many people and groups. There is no one single group or person taking this action.
If you want to run for office see the City Clerk for the needed papers.
Quick Reply to Council Member Ferre's Reply to Recall
Answer and Detail to Recall Cause and Reply: Point by Point
It is our belief that you have failed to fulfill the responsibilities of your office by being fiscally irresponsible and disregarding the lives and safety of our citizens.
It is our perception that you have conspired to allocate redevelopment monies to benefit private interests.
Schwab House (Orriginal Purchase RDA Funds), (Sold to City), (Provided/Sold to Schwab), not disclosed to public at the time of sale, negotiation. NOT DONE with proper notice, or record at the time of the event. (Brought out to the light of day by a CITIZEN and State AUDITOR's REPORT).
Loan to City Employee
Carlstrom Land Deals/Relationship
Jacobsen/Town Center
CBH
NO BID CONTRACTS in violation of California State Regulations and Laws
Land Purchases and Sales in Closed Session and not done in accordance to regulations and laws regulating such transactions.
You have, we believe, violated California law by holding secret meetings and making illegal decisions.
ONLY AFTER MONTHS of Public Comment at Council Meeting and Complaint by Citizens did the Council and Council to Council attempt to inform the Public of the nature of the "Closed Meetings" and report back after the "Closed Meeting" the decisions made.
IN addition, it is apparent that the Sheriff is not releasing the Call Log at the request or direction of the City Council.
IN addition, it is clear that the City Council at the Direction of the City Attorney who serves at the Pleasure of the City Manager, Tom Schwab, has taken the tack of using the word "May" to mean "MUST" when determining when a "Closed Meeting" shall be used to hold the public out of many meetings which to not in fact REQUIRE that they are held in "Closed Session".
It is our belief that you made decisions and conspired in matters affecting public finance, public health and safety, in private, in secret communications, and through third party contacts.
It is clear through the statements recorded in the minutes of the council meetings that matters are discussed outside of the Council Chambers.
Public Speakers in agreement with the Staff Position, will often say when "WE" talked and this and that were decided. Worse is when the Council Members themselves say, "We had a discussion and agreed that".. and so forth. Of course who is the WE? Well in some cases it is apparent it is a discussion with the Developer, Council Member and City Manager.
We believe that your conduct exposes the City to litigation, including the Brown Act, and liability, the public to harm, and compromises City finances.
Three Cases resulting from Council Approval of commissionanning Commision, and Planning Department Approvals on the Recommendation of Staff.
One Case in Litigation for the damage of Private Property as a result of city's action.
NO DOUBT IF Better Governance and Management is not required by the City Council, the current methods of miss management will continue to put the city in the path of litigation.
The answer of the officer sought to be recalled is as follows:
All of the allegations are baseless.
This reply is an attempt to simply dismiss the issues raised as being insignificant, and the proponents undeserving of a hearing or their rights to take civic action.
It is my view that this group's attacks on every issue are designed to hide the fact that they have no constructive ideas of their own.
Concerns and Comments are as we know all "Duly Noted" when presented to the Council and as she has no recollection of constructive ideas it is fitting she be recalled. Concerns that have been raised and ignored by the council as a body and in particular this council members instance on limiting the consolation at Council Meetings include:
Failure of the Planning Commission to hold consistently Professional Public Meetings and Practices in evaluation of all Plans placed before it.
Failure of the City Manager to Manage the City's required state reporting and filing of reports. Including but not limited to the Lack of Current General Plan.
Failure of the City's Planning Department to require sufficient EIR documents and studies for City RDA/ City Manager's Pet Projects.
Failure to properly supervise the actions of the City Manager, including the use of threats and intimidations against private property owners.
Failure to hold City Manager accountable for misrepresentations to the Council and Public by his termination.
The above are constructive IDEAS and they address the Real Important Issues of Grand Terrace. These issues were not brought to the Public by Council Members.
In my opinion, the "private interests" these people are against are the businesses this City needs and a new library our community deserves.
The "Private Interest" of these people is to "Improve the Governance of Grand Terrace" for the Benefit of All Citizens not just developers and realtors, and friends of the Council and Chamber of Commerce.
The "New Library" was never fully planned, budgeted, nor thought out as to the real possibility as it relates to the funding provided by the Development Linked to this rational.
This demonstrates the flawed logic, and miss use of the Council Members position. "The Businesses this City Needs" according to Council Member Ferre include Big Box Lowes, with Day Laborers, and Mega Staters, and more Drug/Liquor Stores. NEVER has there been a report as to the increased costs these business will bring to the community, nor has there been sufficient EIR studies.
Council Member Ferre should secure the funds, and plans before she suggests this or that development will provide funds for a library. Fiction, belongs in a Library not in City Council Plans, or actions.
There have been no secret meetings or illegal decisions.
Comments including, "We discussed" and "We feel", and "We decided", or "I was told". Suggest differently. Actions taken suggest otherwise.
In my view, these people are simply upset that I have refused to let them monopolize discussions at Council meetings.
If we have no ideas, there is no reason to have a discussion... this is flawed logic an attack on individual cittizens not the issues raised by the recall. This is a diversionary tactic.
I believe that if they could, they would control all debate before, during and after anyone spoke on any issue they were against.
This belief is disputed by history. Council Member Hilkey often states before the 3 minute rule, and limits put on public consultation and discussion, the citizens and council were able to fully discuss issues and come to better conclusions and made better informed decisions.
More time is spent on "Special Presentations" than on important Issues being discussed. Time taken for photos with Jack Brown take longer than a citizen is allowed to speak.
Citizens at the Podium are not the one that made up a law that does not exist to keep Council members from interacting or answering questions from the public.
Last month Council members Miller and Hilkey told her once again and the community this is a fabrication by Ferre to stifle anyone from asking or answering questions at meetings and she still persist in this violation of Calif. law and denying the citizens their rights.
She feels she is above the law. So demonstrated by her misleading statements after closed sessions on real estate deals that no deal was done when Councilman Hilkey has said in open meeting that there was a deal made and Ferre lied.
As a former Terrace View principal, I would lever harm the lives and safety of our citizens and their children.
This is like saying as a former Catholic Priest, there should be no question as to an individuals decisions, or capacity or conduct.
This "As a Former Terrace View Principal", shows the level of arrogance and elitism Council Member Marretta Ferre holds in her attitude to the Peons who bring forth their legitimate concerns and ideas to the Council at City Council Meetings.
A Principal at a school should be autocratic to the students as the function is that of a surrogate parent to the students. HOWEVER, this management style with dealing with adults be it as a Principal or a City Council Member is inappropriate.
This attitude is not the only cause of the recall, it just adds the the evidence that errors made in the past are either deliberate, or at least should be expected to persist and repeat, therefor Council Member Ferry should be removed from the City Council.
It is my opinion that since I have been unwilling to place the interests of this one group above the interests of the community as a whole, they are now resorting to intimidation tactics. I respectfully request that you decline to sign this petition.
Citizens must look at the interests that have been served by the small group Council Member Ferre attempts to degrade in her reply. First, there is not a "small group". Council Member Ferre attempts to degrade or devalue the citizens contribution to the governance of the city by making the suggestion that all opposition comes from a "Small Group" of the same people who are always against the actions of the city. This is a false statement. This Recall effort has brought to gether individuals who have attempted to address the city's issues, attempted to provide the city with varietytive ideas, and suggestions on a varriety of issues.
The community as a whole would have been better off if there were no opposition to a BIG BOX DEVELOPMENT of LOWES and Mega Staters, More Drug/Liquor Stores and a Giant Lowes benefits who?
The use of Eminent Domain to Force the transfer of Private Property to a Private Party, remains an issue.
The community as a whole would have been better off breathing cement dust from Manhole builders?
The community as a whole would have been better off with a Senior Center built without proper EIR studies?
The community as a whole would be better off without the disclosure and open discussion of the problems behind the Outdoor Adventure Center.
The community as a whole is in great shape being in Debt to the tune of 17 million in tax deferred bonds, 20% of which has to be by law spent on LOW INCOME HOUSING, not just Senior Housing.
The community as a whole is in better shape providing housing for VERY LOW INCOME seniors next to an Elementary School and adjacent to R1 housing, AND the SENIORS to be housed there are in a CITY with no PUBLIC transportation will be distant from the Shopping District.
Will the community as a whole be better if there is no limits on the future highschool's total population, number of parking spaces, water use, and other matters the CITY acutally has the right to have input on?
The community is in great shape when the General Plan is violated by RDA Plans, including the location of the Senior Housing Proposed.
They are now resorting to intimidation tactics.
Let us know what "intimidated you". Perhaps it was the public statement, run again, face a recall again, is a statement of commitment not intimidation. Sell your land or the city will use Eminent Domain to force you to sell, that is intimidation. Warning of problems in proceedures lead to law suit is not intimidation it is a desire to have things done right. Warning of social negitives of Big Box Stores, is that intimidation? Warning of being held accountable, is that intimidation?
Recall supporters feel Grand Terrace needs not to continue the type of Governance you clearly support. Grand Terrace needs to protect itself from your actions.
It is our belief that you have failed to fulfill the responsibilities of your office by being fiscally irresponsible and disregarding the lives and safety of our citizens.
It is our perception that you have conspired to allocate redevelopment monies to benefit private interests.
Schwab House (Orriginal Purchase RDA Funds), (Sold to City), (Provided/Sold to Schwab), not disclosed to public at the time of sale, negotiation. NOT DONE with proper notice, or record at the time of the event. (Brought out to the light of day by a CITIZEN and State AUDITOR's REPORT).
Loan to City Employee
Carlstrom Land Deals/Relationship
Jacobsen/Town Center
CBH
NO BID CONTRACTS in violation of California State Regulations and Laws
Land Purchases and Sales in Closed Session and not done in accordance to regulations and laws regulating such transactions.
You have, we believe, violated California law by holding secret meetings and making illegal decisions.
ONLY AFTER MONTHS of Public Comment at Council Meeting and Complaint by Citizens did the Council and Council to Council attempt to inform the Public of the nature of the "Closed Meetings" and report back after the "Closed Meeting" the decisions made.
IN addition, it is apparent that the Sheriff is not releasing the Call Log at the request or direction of the City Council.
IN addition, it is clear that the City Council at the Direction of the City Attorney who serves at the Pleasure of the City Manager, Tom Schwab, has taken the tack of using the word "May" to mean "MUST" when determining when a "Closed Meeting" shall be used to hold the public out of many meetings which to not in fact REQUIRE that they are held in "Closed Session".
It is our belief that you made decisions and conspired in matters affecting public finance, public health and safety, in private, in secret communications, and through third party contacts.
It is clear through the statements recorded in the minutes of the council meetings that matters are discussed outside of the Council Chambers.
Public Speakers in agreement with the Staff Position, will often say when "WE" talked and this and that were decided. Worse is when the Council Members themselves say, "We had a discussion and agreed that".. and so forth. Of course who is the WE? Well in some cases it is apparent it is a discussion with the Developer, Council Member and City Manager.
We believe that your conduct exposes the City to litigation, including the Brown Act, and liability, the public to harm, and compromises City finances.
Three Cases resulting from Council Approval of commissionanning Commision, and Planning Department Approvals on the Recommendation of Staff.
One Case in Litigation for the damage of Private Property as a result of city's action.
NO DOUBT IF Better Governance and Management is not required by the City Council, the current methods of miss management will continue to put the city in the path of litigation.
The answer of the officer sought to be recalled is as follows:
All of the allegations are baseless.
This reply is an attempt to simply dismiss the issues raised as being insignificant, and the proponents undeserving of a hearing or their rights to take civic action.
It is my view that this group's attacks on every issue are designed to hide the fact that they have no constructive ideas of their own.
Concerns and Comments are as we know all "Duly Noted" when presented to the Council and as she has no recollection of constructive ideas it is fitting she be recalled. Concerns that have been raised and ignored by the council as a body and in particular this council members instance on limiting the consolation at Council Meetings include:
Failure of the Planning Commission to hold consistently Professional Public Meetings and Practices in evaluation of all Plans placed before it.
Failure of the City Manager to Manage the City's required state reporting and filing of reports. Including but not limited to the Lack of Current General Plan.
Failure of the City's Planning Department to require sufficient EIR documents and studies for City RDA/ City Manager's Pet Projects.
Failure to properly supervise the actions of the City Manager, including the use of threats and intimidations against private property owners.
Failure to hold City Manager accountable for misrepresentations to the Council and Public by his termination.
The above are constructive IDEAS and they address the Real Important Issues of Grand Terrace. These issues were not brought to the Public by Council Members.
In my opinion, the "private interests" these people are against are the businesses this City needs and a new library our community deserves.
The "Private Interest" of these people is to "Improve the Governance of Grand Terrace" for the Benefit of All Citizens not just developers and realtors, and friends of the Council and Chamber of Commerce.
The "New Library" was never fully planned, budgeted, nor thought out as to the real possibility as it relates to the funding provided by the Development Linked to this rational.
This demonstrates the flawed logic, and miss use of the Council Members position. "The Businesses this City Needs" according to Council Member Ferre include Big Box Lowes, with Day Laborers, and Mega Staters, and more Drug/Liquor Stores. NEVER has there been a report as to the increased costs these business will bring to the community, nor has there been sufficient EIR studies.
Council Member Ferre should secure the funds, and plans before she suggests this or that development will provide funds for a library. Fiction, belongs in a Library not in City Council Plans, or actions.
There have been no secret meetings or illegal decisions.
Comments including, "We discussed" and "We feel", and "We decided", or "I was told". Suggest differently. Actions taken suggest otherwise.
In my view, these people are simply upset that I have refused to let them monopolize discussions at Council meetings.
If we have no ideas, there is no reason to have a discussion... this is flawed logic an attack on individual cittizens not the issues raised by the recall. This is a diversionary tactic.
I believe that if they could, they would control all debate before, during and after anyone spoke on any issue they were against.
This belief is disputed by history. Council Member Hilkey often states before the 3 minute rule, and limits put on public consultation and discussion, the citizens and council were able to fully discuss issues and come to better conclusions and made better informed decisions.
More time is spent on "Special Presentations" than on important Issues being discussed. Time taken for photos with Jack Brown take longer than a citizen is allowed to speak.
Citizens at the Podium are not the one that made up a law that does not exist to keep Council members from interacting or answering questions from the public.
Last month Council members Miller and Hilkey told her once again and the community this is a fabrication by Ferre to stifle anyone from asking or answering questions at meetings and she still persist in this violation of Calif. law and denying the citizens their rights.
She feels she is above the law. So demonstrated by her misleading statements after closed sessions on real estate deals that no deal was done when Councilman Hilkey has said in open meeting that there was a deal made and Ferre lied.
As a former Terrace View principal, I would lever harm the lives and safety of our citizens and their children.
This is like saying as a former Catholic Priest, there should be no question as to an individuals decisions, or capacity or conduct.
This "As a Former Terrace View Principal", shows the level of arrogance and elitism Council Member Marretta Ferre holds in her attitude to the Peons who bring forth their legitimate concerns and ideas to the Council at City Council Meetings.
A Principal at a school should be autocratic to the students as the function is that of a surrogate parent to the students. HOWEVER, this management style with dealing with adults be it as a Principal or a City Council Member is inappropriate.
This attitude is not the only cause of the recall, it just adds the the evidence that errors made in the past are either deliberate, or at least should be expected to persist and repeat, therefor Council Member Ferry should be removed from the City Council.
It is my opinion that since I have been unwilling to place the interests of this one group above the interests of the community as a whole, they are now resorting to intimidation tactics. I respectfully request that you decline to sign this petition.
Citizens must look at the interests that have been served by the small group Council Member Ferre attempts to degrade in her reply. First, there is not a "small group". Council Member Ferre attempts to degrade or devalue the citizens contribution to the governance of the city by making the suggestion that all opposition comes from a "Small Group" of the same people who are always against the actions of the city. This is a false statement. This Recall effort has brought to gether individuals who have attempted to address the city's issues, attempted to provide the city with varietytive ideas, and suggestions on a varriety of issues.
The community as a whole would have been better off if there were no opposition to a BIG BOX DEVELOPMENT of LOWES and Mega Staters, More Drug/Liquor Stores and a Giant Lowes benefits who?
The use of Eminent Domain to Force the transfer of Private Property to a Private Party, remains an issue.
The community as a whole would have been better off breathing cement dust from Manhole builders?
The community as a whole would have been better off with a Senior Center built without proper EIR studies?
The community as a whole would be better off without the disclosure and open discussion of the problems behind the Outdoor Adventure Center.
The community as a whole is in great shape being in Debt to the tune of 17 million in tax deferred bonds, 20% of which has to be by law spent on LOW INCOME HOUSING, not just Senior Housing.
The community as a whole is in better shape providing housing for VERY LOW INCOME seniors next to an Elementary School and adjacent to R1 housing, AND the SENIORS to be housed there are in a CITY with no PUBLIC transportation will be distant from the Shopping District.
Will the community as a whole be better if there is no limits on the future highschool's total population, number of parking spaces, water use, and other matters the CITY acutally has the right to have input on?
The community is in great shape when the General Plan is violated by RDA Plans, including the location of the Senior Housing Proposed.
They are now resorting to intimidation tactics.
Let us know what "intimidated you". Perhaps it was the public statement, run again, face a recall again, is a statement of commitment not intimidation. Sell your land or the city will use Eminent Domain to force you to sell, that is intimidation. Warning of problems in proceedures lead to law suit is not intimidation it is a desire to have things done right. Warning of social negitives of Big Box Stores, is that intimidation? Warning of being held accountable, is that intimidation?
Recall supporters feel Grand Terrace needs not to continue the type of Governance you clearly support. Grand Terrace needs to protect itself from your actions.
Council Member Maryetta Ferre Reply to the Recall
RECALL PETITION
TO THE HONORABLE Brenda Mesa, City Clerk Pursuant to the California Constitution and California Election laws, we the undersigned registered and qualified electors of the County of San Bernardino, City of Grand Terrace, California, respectfully state that we seek the recall and removal of Maryetta Ferre holding the office of Council Member in San Bernardino County, City of Grand Terrace, California. We demand an election of a successor to that office. The following Notice of Intention to Circulate Recall Petition was served on June 22, 2006 to Maryetta Ferre:
TO THE HONORABLE Maryetta Ferre
Pursuant to Section 11020 of the California Elections Code, the undersigned, registered qualified voters of the Grand Terrace City, County of San Bernardino County, State of California, hereby give notice that we are the proponents of a recall petition and that we intend to seek your recall and removal from the office of Council Member, in the Grand Terrace City, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and to demand an election of a successor for that office. The grounds for the proposal recall are as follows:
The answer of the officer sought to be recalled is as follows:
It is our belief that you have failed to fulfill the responsibilities of your office by being fiscally irresponsible and disregarding the lives and safety of our citizens. It is our perception that you have conspired to allocate redevelopment monies to benefit private interests. You have, we believe, violated California law by holding secret meetings and making illegal decisions. It is our belief that you made decisions and conspired in matters affecting public finance, public health and safety, in private, in secret communications, and through third party contacts. We believe that your conduct exposes the City to litigation, including the Brown Act, and liability, the public to harm, and compromises City finances. The names of the proponents (business or residence addresses are on file with the elections official) are as follows:
Kimberly A. Stromwall
Ronald Ogawa
William Hays
Cynthia Bidney
Patricia Farley
Georgine E. Gehrig
Diane Gehrig
Milford G. Herman
Mark R. Garcia
Lawrence A. Stromwall
The answer of the officer sought to be recalled is as follows:
All of the allegations are baseless. It is my view that this group’s attacks on every issue are designed to hide the fact that they have no constructive ideas of their own. In my opinion, the “private interests” these people are against are the businesses this City needs and a new library our community deserves. There have been no secret meetings or illegal decisions. In my view, these people are simply upset that I have refused to let them monopolize discussions at Council meetings. I believe that if they could, they would control all debate before, during and after anyone spoke on any issue they were against. As a former Terrace View principal, I would lever harm the lives and safety of our citizens and their children. It is my opinion that since I have been unwilling to place the interests of this one group above the interests of the community as a whole, they are now resorting to intimidation tactics. I respectfully request that you decline to sign this petition.
Each of the undersigned states for himself/herself that he or she is a registered and qualified elector of the San City of Grand Terrace San Bernardino County, California, USA.
TO THE HONORABLE Brenda Mesa, City Clerk Pursuant to the California Constitution and California Election laws, we the undersigned registered and qualified electors of the County of San Bernardino, City of Grand Terrace, California, respectfully state that we seek the recall and removal of Maryetta Ferre holding the office of Council Member in San Bernardino County, City of Grand Terrace, California. We demand an election of a successor to that office. The following Notice of Intention to Circulate Recall Petition was served on June 22, 2006 to Maryetta Ferre:
TO THE HONORABLE Maryetta Ferre
Pursuant to Section 11020 of the California Elections Code, the undersigned, registered qualified voters of the Grand Terrace City, County of San Bernardino County, State of California, hereby give notice that we are the proponents of a recall petition and that we intend to seek your recall and removal from the office of Council Member, in the Grand Terrace City, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and to demand an election of a successor for that office. The grounds for the proposal recall are as follows:
The answer of the officer sought to be recalled is as follows:
It is our belief that you have failed to fulfill the responsibilities of your office by being fiscally irresponsible and disregarding the lives and safety of our citizens. It is our perception that you have conspired to allocate redevelopment monies to benefit private interests. You have, we believe, violated California law by holding secret meetings and making illegal decisions. It is our belief that you made decisions and conspired in matters affecting public finance, public health and safety, in private, in secret communications, and through third party contacts. We believe that your conduct exposes the City to litigation, including the Brown Act, and liability, the public to harm, and compromises City finances. The names of the proponents (business or residence addresses are on file with the elections official) are as follows:
Kimberly A. Stromwall
Ronald Ogawa
William Hays
Cynthia Bidney
Patricia Farley
Georgine E. Gehrig
Diane Gehrig
Milford G. Herman
Mark R. Garcia
Lawrence A. Stromwall
The answer of the officer sought to be recalled is as follows:
All of the allegations are baseless. It is my view that this group’s attacks on every issue are designed to hide the fact that they have no constructive ideas of their own. In my opinion, the “private interests” these people are against are the businesses this City needs and a new library our community deserves. There have been no secret meetings or illegal decisions. In my view, these people are simply upset that I have refused to let them monopolize discussions at Council meetings. I believe that if they could, they would control all debate before, during and after anyone spoke on any issue they were against. As a former Terrace View principal, I would lever harm the lives and safety of our citizens and their children. It is my opinion that since I have been unwilling to place the interests of this one group above the interests of the community as a whole, they are now resorting to intimidation tactics. I respectfully request that you decline to sign this petition.
Each of the undersigned states for himself/herself that he or she is a registered and qualified elector of the San City of Grand Terrace San Bernardino County, California, USA.
Saturday, July 01, 2006
From the Email Inbox: Some Suggested Individual Actions
Dear Gramps: I read this about DESERT HOT SPRINGS and thought... of GRAND TERRACE.
Please post, and I hope the readers read all the way to the end of the post.
Another Small Town in need of Good Governance:
Probe lists wrongs at the city level
DESERT HOT SPRINGS: A grand jury report thumps officials over a contract, poor accounting and more.
10:00 PM PDT on Thursday, June 29, 2006
By DAVID HERMANN
The Press-Enterprise
Concerns ranging from improper accounting and hiring practices to conflicts of interest and ethics violations are detailed in a Riverside County grand jury report on Desert Hot Springs city government.
The four-page report, which was posted online Thursday, lists five issues and an equal number of recommendations on how the city can remedy them.
The findings:
Ethics violations by a former city official who renegotiated a developer's contract so street improvements would extend past the official's property. The official then recommended that the
City Council approve the contract without disclosing a personal interest.
Improper accounting that resulted in special-permit funds being mingled with the city's general fund.
As of 2005, city employees had not received a handbook outlining their employment rights
Some city employees were hired without the required educational degrees and/or criminal background checks.
A former city official simultaneously held five positions, including city manager, city engineer, building official, development director and executive director of the redevelopment agency -- in possible conflict with accepted practices.
The report does not list any names. But former City Manager Jerry Hanson held several city jobs simultaneously during his tenure. Hanson left Desert Hot Springs amid controversy last year and has since filed a claim against the city.
A man who answered the phone at Hanson's home Thursday night said Hanson was out of town and unavailable for comment.
The report recommends:
Ethics training for Desert Hot Springs council members and employees
An audit of the city's specialized funds
Prohibiting city officials from simultaneously holding two or more positions when there is a possible conflict of interest
The distribution of a handbook for employees detailing their rights
Verification of position requirements and educational degrees, and criminal background checks for prospective city employees.
Under California law, Desert Hot Springs has 90 days to respond to the report's findings and recommendations.
The mayor and City Council must submit their comments to the Superior Court judge who impaneled the grand jury.
The recommendations do not carry a penalty if they are not implemented.
Mayor Pro Tem Gary Bosworth, who along with several other residents asked the grand jury last year to investigate Desert Hot Springs, said he looked forward to reviewing the recommendations with his fellow council members -- and implementing them as fully and quickly as possible.
"I am glad that the grand jury has taken the allegations that were brought to them seriously," Boswoth said.
He said the only way that Desert Hot Springs' leaders can regain the public's trust is by dealing with "the warts of the past in the light of day."
http://www.co.san-bernardino.ca.us/da/public_integrity/welcome.asp
GRAMPS OFFERS THIS:
Perhaps our County AG's Office may begin to hear the complaints from Grand Terrace. Would it help if several people filed a letter of complaint or request for an investigation... each person could pick a topic...
Schwab House,
Schwab Car
Use of Public Assets and Sale of Public Assets
Accounting Problems
Employment Contracts/Koontz in Particular
Miss use of RDA Funds, Employee getting loan.
Corporate for Better housing gives contributions to City while asking for Contract/Obligation for the Senior Villa...
Each of these topics could start the ball rolling..
Public Integrity Unit San Bernardino County District Attorney Michael A. Ramos campaigned on the issue of restoring public integrity to San Bernardino County. Within the first four months after being elected, Mr. Ramos fulfilled his promise to the electorate and created the Public Integrity Unit.
The unit, which is comprised of two attorneys, three investigators and a secretary, handles complaints involving those people holding public office. Some types of issues might involve: The illegal use of campaign funds; residency violations; and, open meeting/Brown Act violations.
The Unit will be responsible for monitoring City Councils, elected Boards and Commissions.
The Unit will take anonymous complaints and all complaints must be submitted in writing.
Please mail your complaint to:
Frank Vanella/Public Integrity UnitDistrict Attorney316 N Mt View AveSan Bernardino, CA 92415-0004Or click here to report a complaint via the Internet.
http://www.co.san-bernardino.ca.us/da/public_integrity/form.asp
What is a 501(c)3 Charity Corporation: When is a Non Profit Corporation aka Charity is, and what is a Not for Profit Corporation. Those of you who want to investigate you may want to try the link http://ag.ca.gov/charities/index.htm.
IF you have a concern that a Corporation or Charity is improperly identified as a particular type of classification or should be evaluated you may file such a complaint or concern with the State Attorney General. Please be sure to identify the Specific Institution you are concerned about.
This question has been raised in the Meeting. However the question should be directed to the State Attorney General’s Office.
The question was directed toward the Grand Terrace Baseball Association for which no information comes up.
The question was also directed to:
CORPORATION FOR BETTER HOUSING
EIN Number: 95-4550322
CT Number: 99895
Number: C1769930 Date Filed: 9/13/1995 Status: active
Jurisdiction: California
Address
15303 VENTURA BLVD STE 1100
SHERMAN OAKS, CA 91403
818-905-2480
Agent for Service of Process
JOHN ELEFTHERIOU
15303 VENTURA BLVD STE 1100
SHERMAN OAKS, CA 91403
If you did not find a charity searching by EIN or CT Number, try searching by the organization's name. If you do not get a match for your search query, you can e-mail an inquiry to the Attorney General's Registrar of Charitable Trusts.
Complaint Form CT-9 Form [85KB/1 Pg]
For use by individuals who wish to file a complaint against a charity or other public benefit corporation.
The link to this form is on http://ag.ca.gov/charities/forms.htm It is a PDF file…
You might find that it is your belief that the Corporation For Better Housing is not a Charity it is a Development Company which does not distribute its funds to Charities or Charitable Acts. Payments to Board Members and Employees or to Governmental Entities for the purpose of lobbying for contracts or consideration during development negotiations. If you do please send a form to the Attorney General’s Registrar of Charitable Trusts.
Why is this important?
People may give money to the Corporation for Better Housing and may receive a tax deduction for a Charitable Contribution when no Charity is in fact done.
The Corporation for Better Housing gains competitive advantage and undeserved good will when presenting itself as Charity.
The Corporation for Better Housing gains a cloak of respectability which affords it an easier path through the rigors of Planning Commission, Planning Department and City Council Scrutiny. Charities are assumed to be “Well Wishers” , “Do Good-ers”, above reproach or suspicion.
This may cause unfair trade advantages, and improper contractual processes to be overlooked.
Please do your own study, and take the actions you think appropriate.
Please post, and I hope the readers read all the way to the end of the post.
Another Small Town in need of Good Governance:
Probe lists wrongs at the city level
DESERT HOT SPRINGS: A grand jury report thumps officials over a contract, poor accounting and more.
10:00 PM PDT on Thursday, June 29, 2006
By DAVID HERMANN
The Press-Enterprise
Concerns ranging from improper accounting and hiring practices to conflicts of interest and ethics violations are detailed in a Riverside County grand jury report on Desert Hot Springs city government.
The four-page report, which was posted online Thursday, lists five issues and an equal number of recommendations on how the city can remedy them.
The findings:
Ethics violations by a former city official who renegotiated a developer's contract so street improvements would extend past the official's property. The official then recommended that the
City Council approve the contract without disclosing a personal interest.
Improper accounting that resulted in special-permit funds being mingled with the city's general fund.
As of 2005, city employees had not received a handbook outlining their employment rights
Some city employees were hired without the required educational degrees and/or criminal background checks.
A former city official simultaneously held five positions, including city manager, city engineer, building official, development director and executive director of the redevelopment agency -- in possible conflict with accepted practices.
The report does not list any names. But former City Manager Jerry Hanson held several city jobs simultaneously during his tenure. Hanson left Desert Hot Springs amid controversy last year and has since filed a claim against the city.
A man who answered the phone at Hanson's home Thursday night said Hanson was out of town and unavailable for comment.
The report recommends:
Ethics training for Desert Hot Springs council members and employees
An audit of the city's specialized funds
Prohibiting city officials from simultaneously holding two or more positions when there is a possible conflict of interest
The distribution of a handbook for employees detailing their rights
Verification of position requirements and educational degrees, and criminal background checks for prospective city employees.
Under California law, Desert Hot Springs has 90 days to respond to the report's findings and recommendations.
The mayor and City Council must submit their comments to the Superior Court judge who impaneled the grand jury.
The recommendations do not carry a penalty if they are not implemented.
Mayor Pro Tem Gary Bosworth, who along with several other residents asked the grand jury last year to investigate Desert Hot Springs, said he looked forward to reviewing the recommendations with his fellow council members -- and implementing them as fully and quickly as possible.
"I am glad that the grand jury has taken the allegations that were brought to them seriously," Boswoth said.
He said the only way that Desert Hot Springs' leaders can regain the public's trust is by dealing with "the warts of the past in the light of day."
http://www.co.san-bernardino.ca.us/da/public_integrity/welcome.asp
GRAMPS OFFERS THIS:
Perhaps our County AG's Office may begin to hear the complaints from Grand Terrace. Would it help if several people filed a letter of complaint or request for an investigation... each person could pick a topic...
Schwab House,
Schwab Car
Use of Public Assets and Sale of Public Assets
Accounting Problems
Employment Contracts/Koontz in Particular
Miss use of RDA Funds, Employee getting loan.
Corporate for Better housing gives contributions to City while asking for Contract/Obligation for the Senior Villa...
Each of these topics could start the ball rolling..
Public Integrity Unit San Bernardino County District Attorney Michael A. Ramos campaigned on the issue of restoring public integrity to San Bernardino County. Within the first four months after being elected, Mr. Ramos fulfilled his promise to the electorate and created the Public Integrity Unit.
The unit, which is comprised of two attorneys, three investigators and a secretary, handles complaints involving those people holding public office. Some types of issues might involve: The illegal use of campaign funds; residency violations; and, open meeting/Brown Act violations.
The Unit will be responsible for monitoring City Councils, elected Boards and Commissions.
The Unit will take anonymous complaints and all complaints must be submitted in writing.
Please mail your complaint to:
Frank Vanella/Public Integrity UnitDistrict Attorney316 N Mt View AveSan Bernardino, CA 92415-0004Or click here to report a complaint via the Internet.
http://www.co.san-bernardino.ca.us/da/public_integrity/form.asp
What is a 501(c)3 Charity Corporation: When is a Non Profit Corporation aka Charity is, and what is a Not for Profit Corporation. Those of you who want to investigate you may want to try the link http://ag.ca.gov/charities/index.htm.
IF you have a concern that a Corporation or Charity is improperly identified as a particular type of classification or should be evaluated you may file such a complaint or concern with the State Attorney General. Please be sure to identify the Specific Institution you are concerned about.
This question has been raised in the Meeting. However the question should be directed to the State Attorney General’s Office.
The question was directed toward the Grand Terrace Baseball Association for which no information comes up.
The question was also directed to:
CORPORATION FOR BETTER HOUSING
EIN Number: 95-4550322
CT Number: 99895
Number: C1769930 Date Filed: 9/13/1995 Status: active
Jurisdiction: California
Address
15303 VENTURA BLVD STE 1100
SHERMAN OAKS, CA 91403
818-905-2480
Agent for Service of Process
JOHN ELEFTHERIOU
15303 VENTURA BLVD STE 1100
SHERMAN OAKS, CA 91403
If you did not find a charity searching by EIN or CT Number, try searching by the organization's name. If you do not get a match for your search query, you can e-mail an inquiry to the Attorney General's Registrar of Charitable Trusts.
Complaint Form CT-9 Form [85KB/1 Pg]
For use by individuals who wish to file a complaint against a charity or other public benefit corporation.
The link to this form is on http://ag.ca.gov/charities/forms.htm It is a PDF file…
You might find that it is your belief that the Corporation For Better Housing is not a Charity it is a Development Company which does not distribute its funds to Charities or Charitable Acts. Payments to Board Members and Employees or to Governmental Entities for the purpose of lobbying for contracts or consideration during development negotiations. If you do please send a form to the Attorney General’s Registrar of Charitable Trusts.
Why is this important?
People may give money to the Corporation for Better Housing and may receive a tax deduction for a Charitable Contribution when no Charity is in fact done.
The Corporation for Better Housing gains competitive advantage and undeserved good will when presenting itself as Charity.
The Corporation for Better Housing gains a cloak of respectability which affords it an easier path through the rigors of Planning Commission, Planning Department and City Council Scrutiny. Charities are assumed to be “Well Wishers” , “Do Good-ers”, above reproach or suspicion.
This may cause unfair trade advantages, and improper contractual processes to be overlooked.
Please do your own study, and take the actions you think appropriate.
Friday, June 30, 2006
IMPORTANT NUMBERS: BE SAFE PLEASE
BOOKING NUMBER: 0607340187 DATE: 07/02/2006 TIME: 0526
ARREST DATE: 07/02/2006 TIME: 0230 LOC: PARADISE/PEACOCK AGENCY: GRANDTERRACE CITY
RELEASE DATE: 07/02/2006 TIME: 1659 FACILITY:
NAME: LAST: NELSON FIRST: MICHAEL MIDDLE: LEE DOB: 05/30/1967 SEX: M
RACE: W HT: 5 10 WT: 185 HAIR: BRO EYE COLOR: BRO OCCUPATION: NONE LISTED
CHARGE TYPE SUPPL/HOLD BAIL DISPOSITION
ARREST DATE: 07/02/2006 TIME: 0230 LOC: PARADISE/PEACOCK AGENCY: GRANDTERRACE CITY
RELEASE DATE: 07/02/2006 TIME: 1659 FACILITY:
NAME: LAST: NELSON FIRST: MICHAEL MIDDLE: LEE DOB: 05/30/1967 SEX: M
RACE: W HT: 5 10 WT: 185 HAIR: BRO EYE COLOR: BRO OCCUPATION: NONE LISTED
CHARGE TYPE SUPPL/HOLD BAIL DISPOSITION
PC148(A)(1) MISD ORIGINAL NO BAIL CITE-REL
PC242 MISD ORIGINAL
***
**
*
**
*
PC148.1. (a) Any person who reports to any peace officer listed inSection 830.1 or 830.2, or subdivision (a) of Section 830.33, employee of a fire department or fire service, district attorney, newspaper, radio station, television station, deputy district attorney, employees of the Department of Justice, employees of an airline, employees of an airport, employees of a railroad or busline, an employee of a telephone company, occupants of a building or a news reporter in the employ of a newspaper or radio or television station, that a bomb or other explosive has been or will be placed or secreted in any public or private place, knowing that the report is false, is guilty of a crime punishable by imprisonment in the state prison, or imprisonment in the county jail not to exceed one year.
PC242. A battery is any willful and unlawful use of force or violence upon the person of another.
July 3, 2006... Illegal Fireworks reported on the west side of GT, could be observed from Rollings Park. Insufficient detail on location.
*
*
*
IF you have made Firework / Fire Report to either the Sheriff or the Fire Department. Please email grandterracenews@yahoo.com the details.
Please include:
Location, (it doesn't' have to be exact).
Type of problem reported. Time called in.
Agency Called, Phone Number used, Name of person on phone if you remember. Response time if any response was made.
A log of this time is needed to verify the effectiveness of enforcement, and the risks of Fireworks in GT.
Thank you
Gramps.
Thank you
Gramps.
USE 911 in an Emergency :
If you are calling an emergency from home land line,
GT Tip Line for Fireworks Violations
909-430-2201
Resident's calls will be answered on the 4th
from 7 p.m to 12 midnight
PROGRAM THESE NUMBERS INTO YOUR CELL PHONE
TELL THE PERSON ANSWERS THE LEVEL OF URGENCY AND THAT YOU ARE CALLING FROM A CELL PHONE AND CAN'T CALL 911
****
If you are calling an emergency from home land line,
GT Tip Line for Fireworks Violations
909-430-2201
Resident's calls will be answered on the 4th
from 7 p.m to 12 midnight
PROGRAM THESE NUMBERS INTO YOUR CELL PHONE
TELL THE PERSON ANSWERS THE LEVEL OF URGENCY AND THAT YOU ARE CALLING FROM A CELL PHONE AND CAN'T CALL 911
****
Grand Terrace FIRE Station #23 ..........(909)825-0221
San Bernardino County Sheriff ...........(909) 824-0680
(non-emergency)
Crime Prevention .................................(909) 430-2224
Citizen's Patrol ....................................(909) 430-2222
San Bernardino County Sheriff ...........(909) 824-0680
(non-emergency)
Crime Prevention .................................(909) 430-2224
Citizen's Patrol ....................................(909) 430-2222
****
With all major news papers and the local radio stations identifying Grand Terrace as being one of the Cities that allows "Safe and Sane" fireworks expect to be host to the friends and neighbors who chose to visit during Firework Season. Keep an eye out for Safety.
****
Please report unsafe practices before they become a tragedy.
From the Email InBox: A Question.
Friends:
Am I the only one that is curious as to the whereabouts of the 8-9 million dollars that Schwab gave the Corp. For Better Housing. Should it not be in an escrow account while the Senior Villa's are being built, drawing interest for the RDA and released as the Corp shows that it needs X amount to construct each step? I'm no contractor but I believe that is how even two or three hundred thousand dollar houses are constructed. So all you folks that are smarter than me on construction pipe in here.
Gramps will start the answer:
All contracts should have a section called terms and conditions. One of those conditions relates to the price, and how the money will be paid and when. The specifics of this should be available in the Contract between GT Redevelopment Agency/City of Grand Terrace and the Corporation for Better Housing.
It would seem to most people that an escrow account would be appropriate or a performance bond of some sort at least. It may well be that the contract between the two is nullified and the City of Grand Terrace will have to pay a settlement of some sort to off set actual expenses up to the date of contract cancellation. These are the specific terms and conditions spelled out in a contract. Grand Terrace may be found not liable for these real costs or the costs may be discounted as the Corporation for Better Housing may be found to have been the cause or partial cause of the cancellation, and a court may even require the Corporation for Better Housing to pay punitive damages to the City / RDA and Citizens for having made a bad contract.
So it is back to the question what were the particulars of the DEAL. The City could have posted the contracts on the web site so the Citizens would know the particulars prior to the City Councils Approval of the Contract, but no the citizens are not so informed.
Am I the only one that is curious as to the whereabouts of the 8-9 million dollars that Schwab gave the Corp. For Better Housing. Should it not be in an escrow account while the Senior Villa's are being built, drawing interest for the RDA and released as the Corp shows that it needs X amount to construct each step? I'm no contractor but I believe that is how even two or three hundred thousand dollar houses are constructed. So all you folks that are smarter than me on construction pipe in here.
Gramps will start the answer:
All contracts should have a section called terms and conditions. One of those conditions relates to the price, and how the money will be paid and when. The specifics of this should be available in the Contract between GT Redevelopment Agency/City of Grand Terrace and the Corporation for Better Housing.
It would seem to most people that an escrow account would be appropriate or a performance bond of some sort at least. It may well be that the contract between the two is nullified and the City of Grand Terrace will have to pay a settlement of some sort to off set actual expenses up to the date of contract cancellation. These are the specific terms and conditions spelled out in a contract. Grand Terrace may be found not liable for these real costs or the costs may be discounted as the Corporation for Better Housing may be found to have been the cause or partial cause of the cancellation, and a court may even require the Corporation for Better Housing to pay punitive damages to the City / RDA and Citizens for having made a bad contract.
So it is back to the question what were the particulars of the DEAL. The City could have posted the contracts on the web site so the Citizens would know the particulars prior to the City Councils Approval of the Contract, but no the citizens are not so informed.
Thursday, June 29, 2006
From the Email Inbox: More on the Senior Villas Case
Dear Gramps .... please post:
Dear Grampa:
I would just like to say a few words regarding the accusations that the residents of Brentwood St. don’t care one bit about the Seniors in our wonderful city of Grand Terrace.
When this whole project came to our attention, purely by accident, we understood why the Senior Center needed to be modernized and enlarged. However, we never wanted to have a 120-unit, three story apartment building on 2 acres behind our quiet neighborhood street for low to moderate seniors or anyone else.
The park and a new Senior Center would fit perfectly on the 6 acre parcel. Also remember that only 4 acres were donated to the city as a remembrance of the daughter of a past mayor. The other 2 acres were bought by the city from a former resident who died and his family didn’t want the property. Also the property was never offered for sale to the public before the city purchased it.
I would also like to make it quite clear that I am glad the law suit was granted to the residents so that any future projects will hopefully allow the residents that it will affect the most can be more involved in making the project fit our neighborhood and not be an eye sore.
Thank you,
Gramp's Reply:
Thanks for adding your points. They add to the understanding of the issues.
Dear Grampa:
I would just like to say a few words regarding the accusations that the residents of Brentwood St. don’t care one bit about the Seniors in our wonderful city of Grand Terrace.
When this whole project came to our attention, purely by accident, we understood why the Senior Center needed to be modernized and enlarged. However, we never wanted to have a 120-unit, three story apartment building on 2 acres behind our quiet neighborhood street for low to moderate seniors or anyone else.
The park and a new Senior Center would fit perfectly on the 6 acre parcel. Also remember that only 4 acres were donated to the city as a remembrance of the daughter of a past mayor. The other 2 acres were bought by the city from a former resident who died and his family didn’t want the property. Also the property was never offered for sale to the public before the city purchased it.
I would also like to make it quite clear that I am glad the law suit was granted to the residents so that any future projects will hopefully allow the residents that it will affect the most can be more involved in making the project fit our neighborhood and not be an eye sore.
Thank you,
Gramp's Reply:
Thanks for adding your points. They add to the understanding of the issues.
Victory: What is a WIN for the City and Citizens of GT
Victory for the Blog: Strange how in Politics and in the world today we need to define what will be called a Victory. Let me make it clear and to the point what this blog feels will be a Victory for all the Citizens of Grand Terrace.
1: The Current City Manager, and his contracted Staff Be Replaced with Competent Staff which SERVES the community, and City Council, rather than the opposite.
2: A full accounting of ALL Transactions be Made and Evaluated in PUBLIC.
3: All Payments made PUBLISHED on LINE
4: MAXIMUM OPEN GOVERNMENT... CLOSED MEETINGS ONLY WHEN ABSOLUTELY REQUIRED BY LAW.
5: Proper Governance, and Contracting Practices:
a) UP DATED AND CURRENT GENERAL PLAN
*
b) PROPER AND ROUTINE PROCEDURES FOR THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION
*
c) The Retirement of the Redevelopment Agency and City Redevelopment Projects logically ending the City's meddling in the City's Development, and Real Estate Market
*
d) Competitive Bids for all contracts including selection of City Attorney, and City Engineer. Who serve at the Pleasure of the City Council, not the City Manager.
*
e) The guarantee to Property Ownership, HOME or Business. The City should eliminate the use of Eminent Domain to obtain Ownership of property except when the property is used for CITY OWNED and OPERATED FUNCTIONS such as roads, parks, and Youth Centers. City wide retirement of any designation as a REDEVELOPMENT AREA, Blighted AREA or any other designation giving the City or Redevelopment Agency power to DEMAND any conversion of property to a "Improved Use". (IF a property has to be condemned for any safety reason by State or County Law, it should be sold at public auction if the owner fails to remedy the problem or fails to pay the tax bill when the City has enacted a public safety abatement procedure such as weed removal, or a drug lab clean up.)
*
f) Parents at least ONE can work in GT and be able to Parent their Children after school.
*
g) Youth between 7th grade and 12th grade have services provided after school so that NO YOUTH is without Adult interaction and supervision at ALL TIMES.
*
h) City Council, Mayor, City Employees, Sheriff and Staff are Drug Tested quarterly.
*
I) Police and Fire Logs are available on the City Web Page... Including Calls and response time, and arrests.
*
j) City wide wifi (This is the library of the future) We do not need a library with more CD's and DVD's
*
k) City Lost and Found Web Site for Animals and other things...
*
l) City wide maximum speed limit of 35mph. (So Light Electric or Neighborhood Vehicles on the North side of town can do shopping on the South side of Town.
*
m) A GT Community Band of all age groups would be nice.
*
Here is MY LIST of What I want for the Citizens of Grand Terrace. This is what I would consider a Victory. These are Constructive Improvements, and Suggestions.
The Current City Manager, and the Majority of the City Council want things to be as they are.
Check your list and check it twice... What do you want for the City?
School Issues are not CITY issues... Yes CJUSD and our schools need help too. But that is a different blog.
1: The Current City Manager, and his contracted Staff Be Replaced with Competent Staff which SERVES the community, and City Council, rather than the opposite.
2: A full accounting of ALL Transactions be Made and Evaluated in PUBLIC.
3: All Payments made PUBLISHED on LINE
4: MAXIMUM OPEN GOVERNMENT... CLOSED MEETINGS ONLY WHEN ABSOLUTELY REQUIRED BY LAW.
5: Proper Governance, and Contracting Practices:
a) UP DATED AND CURRENT GENERAL PLAN
*
b) PROPER AND ROUTINE PROCEDURES FOR THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION
*
c) The Retirement of the Redevelopment Agency and City Redevelopment Projects logically ending the City's meddling in the City's Development, and Real Estate Market
*
d) Competitive Bids for all contracts including selection of City Attorney, and City Engineer. Who serve at the Pleasure of the City Council, not the City Manager.
*
e) The guarantee to Property Ownership, HOME or Business. The City should eliminate the use of Eminent Domain to obtain Ownership of property except when the property is used for CITY OWNED and OPERATED FUNCTIONS such as roads, parks, and Youth Centers. City wide retirement of any designation as a REDEVELOPMENT AREA, Blighted AREA or any other designation giving the City or Redevelopment Agency power to DEMAND any conversion of property to a "Improved Use". (IF a property has to be condemned for any safety reason by State or County Law, it should be sold at public auction if the owner fails to remedy the problem or fails to pay the tax bill when the City has enacted a public safety abatement procedure such as weed removal, or a drug lab clean up.)
*
f) Parents at least ONE can work in GT and be able to Parent their Children after school.
*
g) Youth between 7th grade and 12th grade have services provided after school so that NO YOUTH is without Adult interaction and supervision at ALL TIMES.
*
h) City Council, Mayor, City Employees, Sheriff and Staff are Drug Tested quarterly.
*
I) Police and Fire Logs are available on the City Web Page... Including Calls and response time, and arrests.
*
j) City wide wifi (This is the library of the future) We do not need a library with more CD's and DVD's
*
k) City Lost and Found Web Site for Animals and other things...
*
l) City wide maximum speed limit of 35mph. (So Light Electric or Neighborhood Vehicles on the North side of town can do shopping on the South side of Town.
*
m) A GT Community Band of all age groups would be nice.
*
Here is MY LIST of What I want for the Citizens of Grand Terrace. This is what I would consider a Victory. These are Constructive Improvements, and Suggestions.
The Current City Manager, and the Majority of the City Council want things to be as they are.
Check your list and check it twice... What do you want for the City?
School Issues are not CITY issues... Yes CJUSD and our schools need help too. But that is a different blog.
Wednesday, June 28, 2006
From the Email Inbox: Brian's Comment
Email REPLY to Brian's Email
Couple other things for Brian. The Citizens that live on Brentwood have rights too. They brought the suit because the City created a zone for the project not a project for the zone. The Corp For Better Housing said they would change the plans for the Brentwood residents and as soon as the check was written nothing changed.
There is a large difference between an insufficient EIR and no EIR
Also the Corp For Better Housing changed the type of housing. After claiming the GT Seniors would be able to live there changed the rules to section 8 (VERY LOW INCOME). There will be 108 Units and 76 will be for VERY LOW INCOME individuals, this will leave 32 for LOW and Moderate INCOME but 10.8 units will be rented at "Market" Rate.
SO.. who will be living there may not be the same Seniors who thought they would be. Will our seniors want to "Play and Lunch" with the New Seniors our community will be inviting to town?
Most people get smarter with information,this is not the case with Brian.
Brian Rwrote:
Well, you got one thing correct, the City of Grand Terrace did lose on 6/27/06. All of us did.
The big losers though, are the Senior Citizens who have to withstand this delay and travel to other cities for a longer period of time to get their meals and companionship due to this spurious lawsuit. I guess that they're just collateral damage in this extended war against Tom Schwab, the City Council, and our sensibilities. I guess collateral suffering is a part of war, right? I'll bet that you're all sitting around basking in the glow of your "victory," totally forgetting about who really suffers... The seniors. I know that you and yours are incapable of admitting that you're wrong...Ever (you've admitted as much re: the recall), so I will never expect that, but in your quiet time, think about it. Who is being served by with-holding meals from seniors to try to bring down city leaders? This senior center will built, so why not let this battle go so the center can be finished and the seniors can have their gathering place back? All that's happening now is obstruction to make a point.
I know that your answer will be, "don't blame the plaintiff(s), blame the incompetent city" so don't even bother with that. The city didn't obstruct the process, they're just trying to build a better facility for city seniors. Please post this.
Brian Reinarz
Gramps Writes:
I could say, I don't agree with Brian so I won't post his comment. However, I will post it as a demonstration of flawed rational. Brian calls this a spurious lawsuit. The Judge has determined otherwise. In addition the JUDGE had ordered the City NOT to continue with the project until there was a finding by the court. THE CITY WENT AHEAD WITH THE CLOSING, AND MOVING OF THE OLD CENTER.
The people who filed suit, by the way, I am not one of... Did not close the Senior Center, they did not deprive any one of meals and companion ship. THE CITY DID by disregarding a COURT ORDER.
AGAIN you are placing "Blame" on the wrong actors...
Fortunately, many of the Seniors have found they can car pool to the fine Senior services in the City of Colton, there is a greater collaboration by our seniors, and they are still getting their meals and companionship.
If you don't want to be bothered with a reply don't email me. Your wife who works at the city of GT should be able to provide interesting insider information about the city's fantastic services and professionalism. Send your comments to the Press or the Sun or the Blue Mt. Outlook, or the Grand Terrace City News.
We (INCLUDING SENIORS) will be WINNERS when the Governance of the City IMPROVES, and the Development in this town is done in accordance to Good Governance Practices, Good Contractual Management, and in accordance to all LEGAL REQUIREMENTS. CITY MANAGER, Tom Schwab, the City Council, nor the other Bad Actors in this are those who need to LEARN from this Court Finding. This Judge is hearing all the other GT CASES. and he has ruled only on one of several issues on this particular case. More ISSUES will be ruled upon in the future.
And HERE COMES a CONSTRUCTIVE SUGGESTION:
Perhaps the Money the Staff recommends to spend on the Visitor Center would be better spent to offset the cost of carpools provided the seniors. Fontana has such a compensation program. It provides the drivers with a compensation to cover the cost of the transportation.
This would be a reasonable thing to implement and adopt as a true community service. We live where PUBLIC transportation is very limited, and even when there is a GT Senior Center the need for alternatives in transportation for seniors will continue. Senior help each other get to Doctor's appointments do their shopping and errands and all sorts of support of each other.
Seniors are in many ways more adaptable than younger folk. A touch of cash will encourage a person with a car and on a limited budget to be able to offer to drive more, and it will remove the barrier of asking for a ride. Fontana and other cities have found this a successful answer to senior transportation. I recommend it be implemented in GT.
AND AN ADDITIONAL SUGGESTION:
The city should be managed by a City Manager which will require the Law Be followed, and Good Governance Practices Followed. IF the City Manager is not able to do this HE and HIS minions should be removed from service. The city obstructed the building of low and moderate income housing for seniors by many of its own acts.
No housing plan for all citizens.
No Competitive Bids
Insufficient EIR and in some cases no EIR added by reader
Improper process and procedure
No Current General Plan
Violation of the Expired General Plan
Rushed Zone changes
Commencing with Development while Court Action Pending, and against Court Order.
Couple other things for Brian. The Citizens that live on Brentwood have rights too. They brought the suit because the City created a zone for the project not a project for the zone. The Corp For Better Housing said they would change the plans for the Brentwood residents and as soon as the check was written nothing changed.
There is a large difference between an insufficient EIR and no EIR
Also the Corp For Better Housing changed the type of housing. After claiming the GT Seniors would be able to live there changed the rules to section 8 (VERY LOW INCOME). There will be 108 Units and 76 will be for VERY LOW INCOME individuals, this will leave 32 for LOW and Moderate INCOME but 10.8 units will be rented at "Market" Rate.
SO.. who will be living there may not be the same Seniors who thought they would be. Will our seniors want to "Play and Lunch" with the New Seniors our community will be inviting to town?
Most people get smarter with information,this is not the case with Brian.
Brian R
Well, you got one thing correct, the City of Grand Terrace did lose on 6/27/06. All of us did.
The big losers though, are the Senior Citizens who have to withstand this delay and travel to other cities for a longer period of time to get their meals and companionship due to this spurious lawsuit. I guess that they're just collateral damage in this extended war against Tom Schwab, the City Council, and our sensibilities. I guess collateral suffering is a part of war, right? I'll bet that you're all sitting around basking in the glow of your "victory," totally forgetting about who really suffers... The seniors. I know that you and yours are incapable of admitting that you're wrong...Ever (you've admitted as much re: the recall), so I will never expect that, but in your quiet time, think about it. Who is being served by with-holding meals from seniors to try to bring down city leaders? This senior center will built, so why not let this battle go so the center can be finished and the seniors can have their gathering place back? All that's happening now is obstruction to make a point.
I know that your answer will be, "don't blame the plaintiff(s), blame the incompetent city" so don't even bother with that. The city didn't obstruct the process, they're just trying to build a better facility for city seniors. Please post this.
Brian Reinarz
Gramps Writes:
I could say, I don't agree with Brian so I won't post his comment. However, I will post it as a demonstration of flawed rational. Brian calls this a spurious lawsuit. The Judge has determined otherwise. In addition the JUDGE had ordered the City NOT to continue with the project until there was a finding by the court. THE CITY WENT AHEAD WITH THE CLOSING, AND MOVING OF THE OLD CENTER.
The people who filed suit, by the way, I am not one of... Did not close the Senior Center, they did not deprive any one of meals and companion ship. THE CITY DID by disregarding a COURT ORDER.
AGAIN you are placing "Blame" on the wrong actors...
Fortunately, many of the Seniors have found they can car pool to the fine Senior services in the City of Colton, there is a greater collaboration by our seniors, and they are still getting their meals and companionship.
If you don't want to be bothered with a reply don't email me. Your wife who works at the city of GT should be able to provide interesting insider information about the city's fantastic services and professionalism. Send your comments to the Press or the Sun or the Blue Mt. Outlook, or the Grand Terrace City News.
We (INCLUDING SENIORS) will be WINNERS when the Governance of the City IMPROVES, and the Development in this town is done in accordance to Good Governance Practices, Good Contractual Management, and in accordance to all LEGAL REQUIREMENTS. CITY MANAGER, Tom Schwab, the City Council, nor the other Bad Actors in this are those who need to LEARN from this Court Finding. This Judge is hearing all the other GT CASES. and he has ruled only on one of several issues on this particular case. More ISSUES will be ruled upon in the future.
And HERE COMES a CONSTRUCTIVE SUGGESTION:
Perhaps the Money the Staff recommends to spend on the Visitor Center would be better spent to offset the cost of carpools provided the seniors. Fontana has such a compensation program. It provides the drivers with a compensation to cover the cost of the transportation.
This would be a reasonable thing to implement and adopt as a true community service. We live where PUBLIC transportation is very limited, and even when there is a GT Senior Center the need for alternatives in transportation for seniors will continue. Senior help each other get to Doctor's appointments do their shopping and errands and all sorts of support of each other.
Seniors are in many ways more adaptable than younger folk. A touch of cash will encourage a person with a car and on a limited budget to be able to offer to drive more, and it will remove the barrier of asking for a ride. Fontana and other cities have found this a successful answer to senior transportation. I recommend it be implemented in GT.
AND AN ADDITIONAL SUGGESTION:
The city should be managed by a City Manager which will require the Law Be followed, and Good Governance Practices Followed. IF the City Manager is not able to do this HE and HIS minions should be removed from service. The city obstructed the building of low and moderate income housing for seniors by many of its own acts.
No housing plan for all citizens.
No Competitive Bids
Insufficient EIR and in some cases no EIR added by reader
Improper process and procedure
No Current General Plan
Violation of the Expired General Plan
Rushed Zone changes
Commencing with Development while Court Action Pending, and against Court Order.
and more.....
Earnestly,
Gramps
Court Case In the Press: Senior Villas
City ordered to review environmental impact
02:03 PM PDT on
Wednesday, June 28, 2006
Julie Farren
The city of Grand Terrace will have to prepare an environmental impact review before proceeding with a 120-unit senior housing project, a Superior Court judge ruled Tuesday.
A group called Citizens for Responsible and Open Government filed a lawsuit against the city in late October, claiming that city didn’t adequately examine the environmental impacts of Blue Mountain Senior Villas and failed to evaluate project alternatives.
San Bernardino Superior Court Judge John Wade ruled that the developer, Corporation for Better Housing in Woodland Hills, did not consider additional noise and increased population generated by the senior housing complex and adjoining senior center.
Attorney Raymond Johnson, of Johnson and Sedlack, who is representing the Brentwood Street residents, said the city will have to rescind all project approvals for the $18 million project.
City Manager Tom Schwab said an environmental impact review will have to be conducted.
—Julie Farren
jfarren@PE.com
http://www.pe.com/localnews/grandterrace/stories/BWEB.73befb5.html
02:03 PM PDT on
Wednesday, June 28, 2006
Julie Farren
The city of Grand Terrace will have to prepare an environmental impact review before proceeding with a 120-unit senior housing project, a Superior Court judge ruled Tuesday.
A group called Citizens for Responsible and Open Government filed a lawsuit against the city in late October, claiming that city didn’t adequately examine the environmental impacts of Blue Mountain Senior Villas and failed to evaluate project alternatives.
San Bernardino Superior Court Judge John Wade ruled that the developer, Corporation for Better Housing in Woodland Hills, did not consider additional noise and increased population generated by the senior housing complex and adjoining senior center.
Attorney Raymond Johnson, of Johnson and Sedlack, who is representing the Brentwood Street residents, said the city will have to rescind all project approvals for the $18 million project.
City Manager Tom Schwab said an environmental impact review will have to be conducted.
—Julie Farren
jfarren@PE.com
http://www.pe.com/localnews/grandterrace/stories/BWEB.73befb5.html
Tuesday, June 27, 2006
Remember to Check Meganslaw Web Site:
Please know who lives next to you... who is in GT and may visit GT for shopping.
http://www.meganslaw.ca.gov/index.aspx
Remember these folks have rights, but YOU and Your Family Have the Right to Know WHO they are.
http://www.meganslaw.ca.gov/index.aspx
Remember these folks have rights, but YOU and Your Family Have the Right to Know WHO they are.
Citizens of GT Win a Reversal of Prior Approval for BMSV
The City of Grand Terrace lost today 7-27-06 in court regarding the Blue Mt. Senior Villas issue.
The Judge reversed all the prior approvals granted for the construction of the project.
The Judge will issue a writ demanding that an environmental EIR report is done before any new project approvals are sought or granted.
The EIR for the project must address the location of the buildings surrounded by all R-1 housing and the noise factor. The Judge agreed with the city on a single point; that traffic is not a big issue. The attorneys were told that the decision is final and cannot be appealed.
The City Attorney John Harper sent his son to represent the City Staff's position which passed the RDA and City Council and Richard Schulman appeared for the Corporation for better housing.
Councilman Miller and Councilman Hilkey tried to be more deliberative, but were cut off from any discussion or ignored by Councilwoman acting Mayor Chairperson Ferre during both RDA and Council debate on the issues relating to the development. While Council Member Cortes and Council Member Garcia rushed motion after motion to the floor prior to the full resolution, discussion and evaluation of all facts and issues.
This failure to adherer to the procedure and process of governance is without a doubt what will be found in all the other lawsuits. The lawsuits are all pretty much based on the same lack of adhering to the law. In spite of repeated attempts of citizens to bring these facts to the attention and awareness of the Council and Board there has been persistent avoidance of doing things in accordance to the law and process of governance.
So here we are: The perpetual miss-management of procedure, management, and governance is the cause of this action. The responsibility rests on the City Manager Tom Schwab and his three Council Members who are his dutiful adherents and devotees.
Gramps Asks: Does this mean the Planning Commission’s Approvals, City Council Approvals, and the Check sent to Corporation For Better Housing are all reversed?
Perhaps the money will be returned and the project put where it was Planned with a competitive BID. Perhaps the Judge and Citizens should look into the State saying that the City NEEDS a total HOUSING PLAN for ALL Citizens not JUST SENIORS as a cause of termination of the total project. It will be interesting to read the writ yet to be released.
Oh and who gets to go to jail for weekends for the violation of the court order to not proceed?
The Judge reversed all the prior approvals granted for the construction of the project.
The Judge will issue a writ demanding that an environmental EIR report is done before any new project approvals are sought or granted.
The EIR for the project must address the location of the buildings surrounded by all R-1 housing and the noise factor. The Judge agreed with the city on a single point; that traffic is not a big issue. The attorneys were told that the decision is final and cannot be appealed.
The City Attorney John Harper sent his son to represent the City Staff's position which passed the RDA and City Council and Richard Schulman appeared for the Corporation for better housing.
Councilman Miller and Councilman Hilkey tried to be more deliberative, but were cut off from any discussion or ignored by Councilwoman acting Mayor Chairperson Ferre during both RDA and Council debate on the issues relating to the development. While Council Member Cortes and Council Member Garcia rushed motion after motion to the floor prior to the full resolution, discussion and evaluation of all facts and issues.
This failure to adherer to the procedure and process of governance is without a doubt what will be found in all the other lawsuits. The lawsuits are all pretty much based on the same lack of adhering to the law. In spite of repeated attempts of citizens to bring these facts to the attention and awareness of the Council and Board there has been persistent avoidance of doing things in accordance to the law and process of governance.
So here we are: The perpetual miss-management of procedure, management, and governance is the cause of this action. The responsibility rests on the City Manager Tom Schwab and his three Council Members who are his dutiful adherents and devotees.
Gramps Asks: Does this mean the Planning Commission’s Approvals, City Council Approvals, and the Check sent to Corporation For Better Housing are all reversed?
Perhaps the money will be returned and the project put where it was Planned with a competitive BID. Perhaps the Judge and Citizens should look into the State saying that the City NEEDS a total HOUSING PLAN for ALL Citizens not JUST SENIORS as a cause of termination of the total project. It will be interesting to read the writ yet to be released.
Oh and who gets to go to jail for weekends for the violation of the court order to not proceed?
Music in the Summer:
Hold this Date open For:
Riverside Community Band - Concert
Aug 18 ---- 6:30 pm (Time From Band Web Page)
Aug 18 ---- 6:30 pm (Time From Band Web Page)
*
*
Rollins Park
22735 DeBerry St
Grand Terrace
*
*
Bring Your Blankets and Lawn Chairs: Snacks and supper will be available at the snack bar operated by our YOUTH Soccer Teams.
Lets support this activity as being a Family Friendly Activity
Did you know GT has folks in the band? See if you know any of them.
Sunday, June 25, 2006
IMPORTANT NUMBERS
USE 911 in an Emergency :
If you are calling an emergency from home land line,
GT Tip Line for Fireworks Violations
909-430-2201
909-430-2201
Resident’s calls will be answered on the 4th
from 7 p.m to 12 midnight
from 7 p.m to 12 midnight
PROGRAM THESE NUMBERS INTO YOUR CELL PHONE
TELL THE PERSON ANSWERS THE LEVEL OF URGENCY AND THAT YOU ARE CALLING FROM A CELL PHONE AND CAN'T CALL 911
Grand Terrace FIRE Station #23 ..........(909)825-0221
San Bernardino County Sheriff ...........(909) 824-0680
(non-emergency)
Crime Prevention .................................(909) 430-2224
Citizen's Patrol ....................................(909) 430-2222
From the Email InBox: Eminent Domain Still a Threat
Friends:
Consider this fact: in just the past year, more than 5,700 properties nationwide have been threatened by or taken with eminent domain for private development - a figure that compares with more than 10,000 examples over a five-year period preceding the Kelo argument, according to one of five reports released today by the Institute for Justice (which argued the Kelo case before the U.S. Supreme Court) and the Castle Coalition. Coupled with this increase in eminent domain abuse, however, has been a virtually unprecedented grassroots and legislative response to the most universally despised Supreme Court ruling in recent memory.
Friday, June 23, is the one-year anniversary of the now-infamous U.S. Supreme Court decision that stripped Americans of any meaningful federal constitutional protection for their private property. To mark that date, the Institute for Justice and the Castle Coalition issued four separate reports yesterday that
1) document the growing problem of eminent domain for private development,
2) chronicle the legislative response to Kelo,
3) demonstrate failed redevelopments that followed government’s use of force to acquire property, and
4) expose the common myths put forward by developers and cities defending eminent domain for private use.
In another document also released yesterday, the Castle Coalition offers property owners who face eminent domain abuse an “Eminent Domain Survival Guide.”
All are available at http://www.castlecoalition.org/kelo/index.html - check them out today!
Christina Walsh
Assistant Castle Coalition Coordinator
Institute for Justice
901 N. Glebe Road, Suite 900
Arlington, VA 22203
(703) 682-9320
www.ij.org
www.castlecoalition.org
Consider this fact: in just the past year, more than 5,700 properties nationwide have been threatened by or taken with eminent domain for private development - a figure that compares with more than 10,000 examples over a five-year period preceding the Kelo argument, according to one of five reports released today by the Institute for Justice (which argued the Kelo case before the U.S. Supreme Court) and the Castle Coalition. Coupled with this increase in eminent domain abuse, however, has been a virtually unprecedented grassroots and legislative response to the most universally despised Supreme Court ruling in recent memory.
Friday, June 23, is the one-year anniversary of the now-infamous U.S. Supreme Court decision that stripped Americans of any meaningful federal constitutional protection for their private property. To mark that date, the Institute for Justice and the Castle Coalition issued four separate reports yesterday that
1) document the growing problem of eminent domain for private development,
2) chronicle the legislative response to Kelo,
3) demonstrate failed redevelopments that followed government’s use of force to acquire property, and
4) expose the common myths put forward by developers and cities defending eminent domain for private use.
In another document also released yesterday, the Castle Coalition offers property owners who face eminent domain abuse an “Eminent Domain Survival Guide.”
All are available at http://www.castlecoalition.org/kelo/index.html - check them out today!
Christina Walsh
Assistant Castle Coalition Coordinator
Institute for Justice
901 N. Glebe Road, Suite 900
Arlington, VA 22203
(703) 682-9320
www.ij.org
www.castlecoalition.org
Free Post: Electronics Dump the Right Way..
FREE DISPOSAL OF BROKEN/UNWANTED MONITORS,TV'S & PC/LAPTOPS...
IF YOU HAVE ANY OF THIS ITEMS THEY NEED TO BE DISPOSED OF PROPERLY.
THAT'S WHAT WE DO SO GIVE US A CALL ELECTRONIC DISPOSAL GROUP 858-271-1616
WE DISPOSE OF THIS ITEMS AT NO CHARGE WHEN YOU MENTION THIS AD.
PLEASE SAVE THIS NUMBER YOU OR SOMEONE YOU KNOW WILL NEED IT SOONER OR LATER>858-271-1616
IF YOU HAVE ANY OF THIS ITEMS THEY NEED TO BE DISPOSED OF PROPERLY.
THAT'S WHAT WE DO SO GIVE US A CALL ELECTRONIC DISPOSAL GROUP 858-271-1616
WE DISPOSE OF THIS ITEMS AT NO CHARGE WHEN YOU MENTION THIS AD.
PLEASE SAVE THIS NUMBER YOU OR SOMEONE YOU KNOW WILL NEED IT SOONER OR LATER>858-271-1616
Points Of Interest to the Citizens
City Manager / Redevelopment Director : Tom Schwab's salary went from 125,000.00 to 150,000.00 at the last round of negotiations which were held behind closed doors as the Brown Act say they "MAY BE" it does not say they "MUST BE".
The last known contract was for 110,000.00 when did it go to 125,000.00? What other costs are on top of this amount that Mr. Schwab is provided as salary are there?
The statement he isn't paid as much as other Local City Manager's is an indication of arrogance. Grand Terrace is not like other cities. The City Contracts all its limited services, and half of those are let without competitive bid process. We have a significantly smaller population, smaller budget, and perhaps our city mayor should be paid at a rate equal to the rate of the Riverside City Manager is. Price per citizen. I wonder if he would want to make that comparative rate of pay? This is an example of poor fiscal management, and a fraud played out on the citizens of Grand Terrace.
We have Fire, Police, Trash contracts to manage. Roads to repair, and Parks to maintain. This should be the limit of the activities of the City. Unless you want to add in to the mix the Senior Center, but they will tell you they are self supporting, and not managed by the City. You can add in the Child Care Facility a few citizens are able to take part in but those funds are just pass through funds again the Management is not done at the City Level. So why should Mr. Schwab get paid so much.
We of course suggest Mr. Schwab should not be employed by our City. However, the position of City manager will exist, and that position should be paid a reasonable compensation. The Median income in Grand Terrace is $65,000.00 per year. That seems fair. However, one may even look at what is the median income of others working IN Grand Terrace, and find we need to lower it even further.
What is the City Clerk being paid? No doubt she does the bulk of the contract paperwork. Give her a Bonus and let her have Tom's Job as he would be insulted by the suggestion of taking less money from the City of Grand Terrace.
Examples of Why Money Matters at City Hall:
Dodson was asking $760,000.00 and the City paid $1,290,000. $540,000 is big change.
How did this happen. Enter Gene Carlstrom owner of Terra Loma to Negotiate the Final Deal between Dodson and the City. In one meeting, behind closed doors the price went up $540,000.00?
Then they divided the check between two Council meeting so they would not have to say in public that they paid that much for Dodsons.
What makes this not pass the SNIFF TEST?
Carlstrom is or was Councilmember Ferre's campaign manager. Councilmember Ferre should not have even been in the room on that deal.
Carlstrom was a former employer of Bea Cortes, and she has returned to working for him after the deal was made.
Carlstrom is now getting paid to be the current property manager on the Dodson property.
Carlstrom is collecting rent checks for the City and then forwarding the money to the city after he takes a fee.
Carlstrom is collecting that rent from a family relative that is living in the house now.
What made this happen?
Well, the zoning of the OAC and the conditions or limitations put on the property made it impossible to sell to a private party. The City's acceptance of the OAC "Plan" and the limits it put on current and future property owners put the Dodson's in a position where their only possible buyer was the Redevelopment Agency. Was the $540,000.00 a pay off so the Dodson's did not sue the city for the abuse of zoning laws? Who knows what went on behind closed doors? Again, this is a case where the Brown act says the meeting "MAY Be" behind closed doors. The Brown Act does not say Real Estate Negotiations "MUST BE" behind closed doors. This is a choice being made by the Council and Board Members as a result of the Directions of the City Manager, who is backed by his friend he hired the City Attorney.
The last known contract was for 110,000.00 when did it go to 125,000.00? What other costs are on top of this amount that Mr. Schwab is provided as salary are there?
The statement he isn't paid as much as other Local City Manager's is an indication of arrogance. Grand Terrace is not like other cities. The City Contracts all its limited services, and half of those are let without competitive bid process. We have a significantly smaller population, smaller budget, and perhaps our city mayor should be paid at a rate equal to the rate of the Riverside City Manager is. Price per citizen. I wonder if he would want to make that comparative rate of pay? This is an example of poor fiscal management, and a fraud played out on the citizens of Grand Terrace.
We have Fire, Police, Trash contracts to manage. Roads to repair, and Parks to maintain. This should be the limit of the activities of the City. Unless you want to add in to the mix the Senior Center, but they will tell you they are self supporting, and not managed by the City. You can add in the Child Care Facility a few citizens are able to take part in but those funds are just pass through funds again the Management is not done at the City Level. So why should Mr. Schwab get paid so much.
We of course suggest Mr. Schwab should not be employed by our City. However, the position of City manager will exist, and that position should be paid a reasonable compensation. The Median income in Grand Terrace is $65,000.00 per year. That seems fair. However, one may even look at what is the median income of others working IN Grand Terrace, and find we need to lower it even further.
What is the City Clerk being paid? No doubt she does the bulk of the contract paperwork. Give her a Bonus and let her have Tom's Job as he would be insulted by the suggestion of taking less money from the City of Grand Terrace.
Examples of Why Money Matters at City Hall:
Dodson was asking $760,000.00 and the City paid $1,290,000. $540,000 is big change.
How did this happen. Enter Gene Carlstrom owner of Terra Loma to Negotiate the Final Deal between Dodson and the City. In one meeting, behind closed doors the price went up $540,000.00?
Then they divided the check between two Council meeting so they would not have to say in public that they paid that much for Dodsons.
What makes this not pass the SNIFF TEST?
Carlstrom is or was Councilmember Ferre's campaign manager. Councilmember Ferre should not have even been in the room on that deal.
Carlstrom was a former employer of Bea Cortes, and she has returned to working for him after the deal was made.
Carlstrom is now getting paid to be the current property manager on the Dodson property.
Carlstrom is collecting rent checks for the City and then forwarding the money to the city after he takes a fee.
Carlstrom is collecting that rent from a family relative that is living in the house now.
What made this happen?
Well, the zoning of the OAC and the conditions or limitations put on the property made it impossible to sell to a private party. The City's acceptance of the OAC "Plan" and the limits it put on current and future property owners put the Dodson's in a position where their only possible buyer was the Redevelopment Agency. Was the $540,000.00 a pay off so the Dodson's did not sue the city for the abuse of zoning laws? Who knows what went on behind closed doors? Again, this is a case where the Brown act says the meeting "MAY Be" behind closed doors. The Brown Act does not say Real Estate Negotiations "MUST BE" behind closed doors. This is a choice being made by the Council and Board Members as a result of the Directions of the City Manager, who is backed by his friend he hired the City Attorney.
Eminent Domain IS Still an OPTION IN GRAND TERRACE
Lobbying Activity Lee Ann Garcia's Associations and Travels at the Expense of the City of Grand Terrace: Putting the Quality of Life of Grand Terrace Citizens at Risk.
LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES
This is the list of lobbyist hired by the League that lobbied against limiting the use of eminent domain and against the State Constitutional Amendment limiting its use to what the Framers intended.
Our Councilwoman Garcia is the Board member for the League for this area and has charged her travel expenses to the City for years for this activity that goes against the majorities' wishes in Grand Terrace. More to follow.
ADDRESS
1400 K STREET, SUITE 400
SACRAMENTO, CA 95814
Phone: (916) 658-8200
RESPONSIBLE OFFICER REGISTRATION DATE STATUS
DWIGHT R. STENBAKKEN, DEPUTY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 01/01/2005 Active
EMPLOYER'S LOBBYISTS
NAME START DATE TERMINATION DATE
LAWSON STARK, LIISA 05/01/2005
HIGGINS, WILLIAM S. 04/01/2006
STENBAKKEN, DWIGHT 01/01/2005
CARRIGG, DANIEL 01/01/2005
HUNTER, YVONNE L. 01/01/2005
KORINKE, JEAN F. 01/01/2005 03/31/2006
THOMAS, P. ANTHONY 01/01/2005
O'GORMAN, AMY 01/01/2005 01/01/2005
EMPLOYER'S FIRMS
NAME START DATE TERMINATION DATE
JEA & ASSOCIATES 01/01/2005
If you see any of these folks in town know that they Support the Use of Eminent Domain for Development Like what Schwab / Jacobsen and the Council that approved the RDA to Negotiate with the Citizen Property Owner on the Behalf of the Developer, threatened and began to do to a Citizen Property Owner in Grand Terrace.
Connecting this to GRAND TERRACE and the FUTURE:
Note the Council has still an outstanding authorization for the "Negotiation" a piece of privately owned property. Making it virtually impossible for this or any property owner to feel that the issues is fully resolved. The council should Put a Resolution on the Agenda that states,
Where AS this Council/Board will not use Eminent Domain to force the sale of property from one private individual to another private individual for the purpose of private development.
Where As the City Manager / Redevelopment Director has no authorization to Negotiate, Suggest, or Offer the use of Eminent Domain for any purpose except when Authorized by Public Vote by this City Council for specific Public Works Projects such as roads, parks and PUBLICLY OWNED Facilities.
Where As all Past use of such action, threats and warnings are from this point hence nullified and the property rights to ownership and free use and enjoyment of private property is restored to all property owners of the City of Grand Terrace.
Where As the threat of the use of Eminent Domain was use against the Citizens and Property owners in the past by the Director of the Redevelopment Agency, with out the authorization of the Council/Board he is to be terminated.
Where As the City Manager, Director of the Redevelopment Agency, miss-guided the City Council , and Redevelopment Board with statements which later were confirmed to be false there is cause to terminate the City Manager,Director of Redevelopment Agency, Tom Schwab with prejudice.
Where As the City Manager, Director of Redevelopment has caused damage to the Citizens of the City, and the Reputation of the City, and induced the City Council and Redevelopment Board to take actions which have affected the Financial Decisions made, there shall be a Full Critical analysis looking for in all of the Financial Records, Contracts, and all matters of City Management and Governance.
Where As at the result of the full audit a full clear disclosure will be made public and available to any investigative agency responsible for the proper use of Local, State and Federal Funds.
Where As the City of Grand Terrace will aspire to be faithful servant to its Citizens in its dealings and governance.
LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES
This is the list of lobbyist hired by the League that lobbied against limiting the use of eminent domain and against the State Constitutional Amendment limiting its use to what the Framers intended.
Our Councilwoman Garcia is the Board member for the League for this area and has charged her travel expenses to the City for years for this activity that goes against the majorities' wishes in Grand Terrace. More to follow.
ADDRESS
1400 K STREET, SUITE 400
SACRAMENTO, CA 95814
Phone: (916) 658-8200
RESPONSIBLE OFFICER REGISTRATION DATE STATUS
DWIGHT R. STENBAKKEN, DEPUTY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 01/01/2005 Active
EMPLOYER'S LOBBYISTS
NAME START DATE TERMINATION DATE
LAWSON STARK, LIISA 05/01/2005
HIGGINS, WILLIAM S. 04/01/2006
STENBAKKEN, DWIGHT 01/01/2005
CARRIGG, DANIEL 01/01/2005
HUNTER, YVONNE L. 01/01/2005
KORINKE, JEAN F. 01/01/2005 03/31/2006
THOMAS, P. ANTHONY 01/01/2005
O'GORMAN, AMY 01/01/2005 01/01/2005
EMPLOYER'S FIRMS
NAME START DATE TERMINATION DATE
JEA & ASSOCIATES 01/01/2005
If you see any of these folks in town know that they Support the Use of Eminent Domain for Development Like what Schwab / Jacobsen and the Council that approved the RDA to Negotiate with the Citizen Property Owner on the Behalf of the Developer, threatened and began to do to a Citizen Property Owner in Grand Terrace.
Connecting this to GRAND TERRACE and the FUTURE:
Note the Council has still an outstanding authorization for the "Negotiation" a piece of privately owned property. Making it virtually impossible for this or any property owner to feel that the issues is fully resolved. The council should Put a Resolution on the Agenda that states,
Where AS this Council/Board will not use Eminent Domain to force the sale of property from one private individual to another private individual for the purpose of private development.
Where As the City Manager / Redevelopment Director has no authorization to Negotiate, Suggest, or Offer the use of Eminent Domain for any purpose except when Authorized by Public Vote by this City Council for specific Public Works Projects such as roads, parks and PUBLICLY OWNED Facilities.
Where As all Past use of such action, threats and warnings are from this point hence nullified and the property rights to ownership and free use and enjoyment of private property is restored to all property owners of the City of Grand Terrace.
Where As the threat of the use of Eminent Domain was use against the Citizens and Property owners in the past by the Director of the Redevelopment Agency, with out the authorization of the Council/Board he is to be terminated.
Where As the City Manager, Director of the Redevelopment Agency, miss-guided the City Council , and Redevelopment Board with statements which later were confirmed to be false there is cause to terminate the City Manager,Director of Redevelopment Agency, Tom Schwab with prejudice.
Where As the City Manager, Director of Redevelopment has caused damage to the Citizens of the City, and the Reputation of the City, and induced the City Council and Redevelopment Board to take actions which have affected the Financial Decisions made, there shall be a Full Critical analysis looking for in all of the Financial Records, Contracts, and all matters of City Management and Governance.
Where As at the result of the full audit a full clear disclosure will be made public and available to any investigative agency responsible for the proper use of Local, State and Federal Funds.
Where As the City of Grand Terrace will aspire to be faithful servant to its Citizens in its dealings and governance.
Saturday, June 24, 2006
From the Email InBox: Surplus of Pot Holes.
Dear Grandpa Terrace.
Thank you for the surplus explanation. Now I understand why when we called the City to get a pothole fixed on Mt. Vernon we were told there was no money to fix it. The City could not come up with fifty bucks worth of asphalt.
Grampa answers:
yup and how many pot holes will 2500.00 repair? That is how much we are thinking of giving per year for a "Promotional" Effort Collaboration with the San Bernardino Visitors Center.
Pot holes, or Promotion and More Traffic... hmmm interesting choice.
Well, when was the last time you heard a report about a Pothole taking a Councilmember of City Manager on a trip or out to lunch, or used as an excuse to charge the city for a lunch, trip or hotel? Hmmm... Perhaps we want to be part of the San Bernardino Visitor's Center so we can later on down the line use that participation as a reason to travel or dine on the City's Dime.
yup, your right, pot holes should be first.
Gramps
Thank you for the surplus explanation. Now I understand why when we called the City to get a pothole fixed on Mt. Vernon we were told there was no money to fix it. The City could not come up with fifty bucks worth of asphalt.
Grampa answers:
yup and how many pot holes will 2500.00 repair? That is how much we are thinking of giving per year for a "Promotional" Effort Collaboration with the San Bernardino Visitors Center.
Pot holes, or Promotion and More Traffic... hmmm interesting choice.
Well, when was the last time you heard a report about a Pothole taking a Councilmember of City Manager on a trip or out to lunch, or used as an excuse to charge the city for a lunch, trip or hotel? Hmmm... Perhaps we want to be part of the San Bernardino Visitor's Center so we can later on down the line use that participation as a reason to travel or dine on the City's Dime.
yup, your right, pot holes should be first.
Gramps
From the Email InBox:
Gramps:
IF and I say IF there is a 5.5 million reserve in CASH why not pay for the Air Conditioner with CASH. WHY have the Finance Charges?
WELL there is not 5.5 or 4.8, million in reserve, in the way we folk think of a Savings Account or Reserve Account.
In one type account there is a BIG DEBT to be Paid in the Future. That is about 15 to 17 Million.
In another Account is Cash ON HAND, and Tax Revenue Expected.
You have to have a BUDGET to say how you are going to spend the Cash on Hand and Expected receipts. The claim the Budget "Surplus" means that the City has a Real positive Net worth is an error in the representation of the City's Financial Status.
Much of the Reserve or Cash the City Manager identifies as being on the Plus side is dedicated to specific expenditures. This is why he had to "Refund" an account for the money he took to pay for the Air Conditioner we had to get a loan to Pay for. Apparently this taking money from one account to then have to refund that account was not information Mr. Schwab felt he had to share with the public or council until it is a done deal. This is at least questionable governance, if not fraud of some sort. Spending money for the wrong thing is not legal even if you later return the money. How dare him do this. How dare the Council to let it be done.
Much of the Debt is a result of obtaining Tax Debt Bonds. These bonds require 20 percent is spent on Low and Moderate Income Housing as part of the condition of the issuance of the bonds. The spending of this 20 percent has been a problem in the past. The State has declared that the Senior Villa's is not sufficient as it only serves the seniors. So that 9 million will be spent, and it will cause a NEED to obtain more Debt to pay for Low and Moderate Income Housing. Or to FUND the set aside for that purpose, after having miss directed that amount to the Senior Villas.
Oh as you say it is much like a shell game. The Pea is the Tax Payer's Money, or Debt.
A balanced budget, means you don't have DEBT after all your budgeted expenses.
It does not mean at the end of the year you are not increasing the long term debt.
A surplus is when you have money left over after paying for all your expenses and debts, long and short term.
This city and its Redevelopment Agency are in a NET DEBT. Lee Ann Garcia, and Marretta Ferre have burdened this city with this bad management and bad governance long enough.
We need a real accounting. We need to get a City Manager who is the Servant of the Council and City, not the inverse. We need members of the City Council who will say NO to the City Manager, and will DEMAND a proper and clear accounting of the status of the City/RDA finances.
Gramps Reply:
You are right. Also right about the Council being Dictated to by Mr. Schwab. The question was put to Lee Ann Garcia, and it was Mr. Schwab's mouth moving. His answer couldn't keep the figures consistant. The statement or question was explain the 5.5 million surplus. Tom Schwab had figures all around that number. Yet, he never said NET amount less the Debt. He only spoke about one half of the Ballance Sheet.
IF and I say IF there is a 5.5 million reserve in CASH why not pay for the Air Conditioner with CASH. WHY have the Finance Charges?
WELL there is not 5.5 or 4.8, million in reserve, in the way we folk think of a Savings Account or Reserve Account.
In one type account there is a BIG DEBT to be Paid in the Future. That is about 15 to 17 Million.
In another Account is Cash ON HAND, and Tax Revenue Expected.
You have to have a BUDGET to say how you are going to spend the Cash on Hand and Expected receipts. The claim the Budget "Surplus" means that the City has a Real positive Net worth is an error in the representation of the City's Financial Status.
Much of the Reserve or Cash the City Manager identifies as being on the Plus side is dedicated to specific expenditures. This is why he had to "Refund" an account for the money he took to pay for the Air Conditioner we had to get a loan to Pay for. Apparently this taking money from one account to then have to refund that account was not information Mr. Schwab felt he had to share with the public or council until it is a done deal. This is at least questionable governance, if not fraud of some sort. Spending money for the wrong thing is not legal even if you later return the money. How dare him do this. How dare the Council to let it be done.
Much of the Debt is a result of obtaining Tax Debt Bonds. These bonds require 20 percent is spent on Low and Moderate Income Housing as part of the condition of the issuance of the bonds. The spending of this 20 percent has been a problem in the past. The State has declared that the Senior Villa's is not sufficient as it only serves the seniors. So that 9 million will be spent, and it will cause a NEED to obtain more Debt to pay for Low and Moderate Income Housing. Or to FUND the set aside for that purpose, after having miss directed that amount to the Senior Villas.
Oh as you say it is much like a shell game. The Pea is the Tax Payer's Money, or Debt.
A balanced budget, means you don't have DEBT after all your budgeted expenses.
It does not mean at the end of the year you are not increasing the long term debt.
A surplus is when you have money left over after paying for all your expenses and debts, long and short term.
This city and its Redevelopment Agency are in a NET DEBT. Lee Ann Garcia, and Marretta Ferre have burdened this city with this bad management and bad governance long enough.
We need a real accounting. We need to get a City Manager who is the Servant of the Council and City, not the inverse. We need members of the City Council who will say NO to the City Manager, and will DEMAND a proper and clear accounting of the status of the City/RDA finances.
Gramps Reply:
You are right. Also right about the Council being Dictated to by Mr. Schwab. The question was put to Lee Ann Garcia, and it was Mr. Schwab's mouth moving. His answer couldn't keep the figures consistant. The statement or question was explain the 5.5 million surplus. Tom Schwab had figures all around that number. Yet, he never said NET amount less the Debt. He only spoke about one half of the Ballance Sheet.
Thursday, June 22, 2006
Where's the Deputy:
Police Services were Reviewed at the City Council Meeting.
It was interesting: The Council Approved a motion to have Staff prepare a contract amendment with the intent of adding one 40 hour deputy and car. This will cost about $200.000.00 per year.
One has to wonder what other service provider would charge. Perhaps the Colton PD who already provides some back up service, and provides services to the CJUSD schools in Colton. Has anyone asked?
What is clear. There is plenty of need for additional Police service. When a call goes out to the Call center that a confrontation JUST took Place at an Elderly Woman's Home on Barton Road, with a description of a Truck and People involved, for it to take a half an hour for the Deputy to arrive. Clearly this was not considered an URGENT CALL.
This call was characterized as being non violent at the council meeting, yet the son arrived at the scene of the crime and had to wrestle the perpetrators out of his mother's home. He was chastised by the Deputy for breaking the white pickup trucks mirror.
IF there were a deputy available to respond faster, the alert for a white pickup, with no plates, and damaged mirror and a description of the driver could have gone out to law enforcement surrounding GT. Perhaps the Colton PD, CHP, or Riverside PD/Sheriff, or Orange County Law Enforcement could have been informed and protected their citizens from the next to crimes of these same individuals.
No now we hear that there have been repeats of this crime in Riverside and Orange County which seem to be the same perpetrators.
This evening the lieutenant said there are composite drawings which indicate it is the same folks.
So where are these composite? May WE SEE THEM... On one hand you ask for help, and then you don't provide us with the information.
Did you get the connection. More Police will equal more arrests, more crime reported on the cities statistics, and that is not good for increasing the house values.
Crime is here. Perhaps there is a direct relationship to the increase in places where alcohol can be purchased and consumed. Perhaps there is a direct relationship to drug use. Perhaps there is a direct relationship to the Increased Housing Costs, requiring both Parents to Commute to jobs distant from their children, leaving a group of individuals un-parented when they need them the most.
As long as we neglect the children and youth of our community by not having a community where parents can afford to parent children or services aren't provided as a surrogate parents we will continue the decline of our civility and community. This will be a trend difficult to turn around.
One way of looking at the reports, fire the police and there will be no crime statistics to report.
How about having a look into our civility and community which fosters criminal behavior. Alcohol, Drugs, unsupervised youth, unemployment, transient population also TRAFFIC or Drive through Criminals. A one day Grand Terrace Day, or a Halloween Haunt is not that which will create civility or community and reduce criminal activity in our community.
More Police does not equal an increase in criminality. In increases the number of crimes recorded and hopeful solved. Increases in criminality are a result of economic, family, and social conditions. These are the issues not being addressed in the discussion of community services, community planning, and yes even the development we select for our community.
It was interesting: The Council Approved a motion to have Staff prepare a contract amendment with the intent of adding one 40 hour deputy and car. This will cost about $200.000.00 per year.
One has to wonder what other service provider would charge. Perhaps the Colton PD who already provides some back up service, and provides services to the CJUSD schools in Colton. Has anyone asked?
What is clear. There is plenty of need for additional Police service. When a call goes out to the Call center that a confrontation JUST took Place at an Elderly Woman's Home on Barton Road, with a description of a Truck and People involved, for it to take a half an hour for the Deputy to arrive. Clearly this was not considered an URGENT CALL.
This call was characterized as being non violent at the council meeting, yet the son arrived at the scene of the crime and had to wrestle the perpetrators out of his mother's home. He was chastised by the Deputy for breaking the white pickup trucks mirror.
IF there were a deputy available to respond faster, the alert for a white pickup, with no plates, and damaged mirror and a description of the driver could have gone out to law enforcement surrounding GT. Perhaps the Colton PD, CHP, or Riverside PD/Sheriff, or Orange County Law Enforcement could have been informed and protected their citizens from the next to crimes of these same individuals.
No now we hear that there have been repeats of this crime in Riverside and Orange County which seem to be the same perpetrators.
This evening the lieutenant said there are composite drawings which indicate it is the same folks.
So where are these composite? May WE SEE THEM... On one hand you ask for help, and then you don't provide us with the information.
Did you get the connection. More Police will equal more arrests, more crime reported on the cities statistics, and that is not good for increasing the house values.
Crime is here. Perhaps there is a direct relationship to the increase in places where alcohol can be purchased and consumed. Perhaps there is a direct relationship to drug use. Perhaps there is a direct relationship to the Increased Housing Costs, requiring both Parents to Commute to jobs distant from their children, leaving a group of individuals un-parented when they need them the most.
As long as we neglect the children and youth of our community by not having a community where parents can afford to parent children or services aren't provided as a surrogate parents we will continue the decline of our civility and community. This will be a trend difficult to turn around.
One way of looking at the reports, fire the police and there will be no crime statistics to report.
How about having a look into our civility and community which fosters criminal behavior. Alcohol, Drugs, unsupervised youth, unemployment, transient population also TRAFFIC or Drive through Criminals. A one day Grand Terrace Day, or a Halloween Haunt is not that which will create civility or community and reduce criminal activity in our community.
More Police does not equal an increase in criminality. In increases the number of crimes recorded and hopeful solved. Increases in criminality are a result of economic, family, and social conditions. These are the issues not being addressed in the discussion of community services, community planning, and yes even the development we select for our community.
Promote Grand Terrace at a Regional Welcome Center?
California Welcome Center:
Yes, it would be nice to have discount cards and maps handy to Grand Terrace. However, Is the the best use of City Funds.
The City Chamber Of Commerce should be doing this as a Chamber. This is not City Business.
How else could money be spent. Let's count the ways. Perhaps paying the light bills at the city parks so they can be used after daylight hours. Perhaps City Wide WiFi service... Perhaps, paying for Youth to Youth Tutoring. At 10.00 per hour of tutoring that would buy 250 hours of tutoring time. That investment could save the State one drop out, and one criminal and one life of living in a jail.
How about, spending that money on providing a RAMP to City Council and Library for Handicapped or physically challenged individuals. How about paying off some of the city loans and debts ahead of schedule?
Oh so many ways to spend the money.
How about a camp out night in the Park for all families who want to participate twice a year in a Night Out... in the park... It could be fun, and an exercise in emergency preparedness, a massive earth quake drill.
Do we want more people to come to Halloween Haunt.. NO..
Is Grand Terrace Days for the Citizens of Grand Terrace or for some other purpose?
Do we want to really promote more traffic through Grand Terrace when Maps show how to bypass the freeway traffic jams...
NO, not only should the money not be spent this way, Grand Terrace should not promote itself to invite More Drive Through Traffic, which brings no more money. What are they thinking. Is there a $ 2.00 level of support. That is all that should be spent on such a thing.
Now, IF the City were to support the development of the south side of the Santa Anna River area where the Manhole Builders Planned to build as a regional park catered by local restaurants, and other businesses. PERHAPS there is a reason to INVITE people to Come to GT on a Visit, but NOT NOW... gads. What are they thinking?
Yes, it would be nice to have discount cards and maps handy to Grand Terrace. However, Is the the best use of City Funds.
The City Chamber Of Commerce should be doing this as a Chamber. This is not City Business.
How else could money be spent. Let's count the ways. Perhaps paying the light bills at the city parks so they can be used after daylight hours. Perhaps City Wide WiFi service... Perhaps, paying for Youth to Youth Tutoring. At 10.00 per hour of tutoring that would buy 250 hours of tutoring time. That investment could save the State one drop out, and one criminal and one life of living in a jail.
How about, spending that money on providing a RAMP to City Council and Library for Handicapped or physically challenged individuals. How about paying off some of the city loans and debts ahead of schedule?
Oh so many ways to spend the money.
How about a camp out night in the Park for all families who want to participate twice a year in a Night Out... in the park... It could be fun, and an exercise in emergency preparedness, a massive earth quake drill.
Do we want more people to come to Halloween Haunt.. NO..
Is Grand Terrace Days for the Citizens of Grand Terrace or for some other purpose?
Do we want to really promote more traffic through Grand Terrace when Maps show how to bypass the freeway traffic jams...
NO, not only should the money not be spent this way, Grand Terrace should not promote itself to invite More Drive Through Traffic, which brings no more money. What are they thinking. Is there a $ 2.00 level of support. That is all that should be spent on such a thing.
Now, IF the City were to support the development of the south side of the Santa Anna River area where the Manhole Builders Planned to build as a regional park catered by local restaurants, and other businesses. PERHAPS there is a reason to INVITE people to Come to GT on a Visit, but NOT NOW... gads. What are they thinking?
Walnut and the Pea Shell Game Goes On
CITY MANAGER TOM SCHWAB DEFENDS COUNCIL WOMAN LEE AN GARCIA'S ANSWER OR REPLY TO RECALL STATEMENT DURING COUNCIL MEETING.
A question was asked and directed to Council Woman Lee Ann Garcia, and Tom Schwab Spoke. Defending her recall response. Perhaps he should let her defend her own political statements.
However, his answer was a continued use of smoke and mirrors of a magician which would gain the respect of the association of magicians.
Again the Reality of Grand Terrace's Financial Status was misrepresented.
Yes, a Savings account, or a Cash account can have cash in it for 4.8 million for the city and apparently 12. Million for the Redevelopment Agency. HOWEVER, this answer is not what was being asked.
When NORMAL people think of a surplus it is a NET calculation. What Mr. Schwab did not include in his answer is the Amount of DEBT which is owed by the City and Redevelopment Agency.
Yes the City has Debt. Bonds are Debt... to be paid in the future.
WHEN some one says they have a surplus it should be reported NET or after all debt is paid. WE DO NOT have a SURPLUS IF ALL DEBT were paid.
PLEASE ASK FOR THE NET ASSESSMENT OF THE CITY.
LET'S Hope, the REAL GTDAYS costs are calculated and reported. Last year the number of hours spent by city, sheriff and persons paid by tax expense were not known in detail sufficient to asses a real cost.
Steve Berry's statement there is ALWAYS a Public Disclosure of the Income and expenses of the GT DAYS is a flat out un true statement. It was like pulling teeth and took Council Member Millers insistence that a report was done, and released.
In addition we had disclosed tonight a bit of insight on how the finances are handled in the Finance Department.
We apparently purchased an Air Conditioner, and did not have funds on hand available to pay for the AC units. WE have so much surplus, we have to take a loan for the purchase. A loan that creates interest expense. Not only did we do this, we took the money from one account to pay that account, and now the loan has been funded that account will be refunded its funds. Now in business that would be called kiting of funds. In your house hold budget that would be called robbing Peter to pay Paul. This is not something you do when you have a surplus of funds.
Now should this concern you. YES. WHY, well it should concern you be cause it took place without Council being made aware of the funds transfer from Peter to Paul, over a year of the event of the purchase. THIS is unacceptable or should be.
Who can run for what office: A big question for Council Members:
Citizens: Please Consider running for Recall Seats term of 2 years, Mayor, or Council Seat 4 year terms.
A question was asked and directed to Council Woman Lee Ann Garcia, and Tom Schwab Spoke. Defending her recall response. Perhaps he should let her defend her own political statements.
However, his answer was a continued use of smoke and mirrors of a magician which would gain the respect of the association of magicians.
Again the Reality of Grand Terrace's Financial Status was misrepresented.
Yes, a Savings account, or a Cash account can have cash in it for 4.8 million for the city and apparently 12. Million for the Redevelopment Agency. HOWEVER, this answer is not what was being asked.
When NORMAL people think of a surplus it is a NET calculation. What Mr. Schwab did not include in his answer is the Amount of DEBT which is owed by the City and Redevelopment Agency.
Yes the City has Debt. Bonds are Debt... to be paid in the future.
WHEN some one says they have a surplus it should be reported NET or after all debt is paid. WE DO NOT have a SURPLUS IF ALL DEBT were paid.
PLEASE ASK FOR THE NET ASSESSMENT OF THE CITY.
LET'S Hope, the REAL GTDAYS costs are calculated and reported. Last year the number of hours spent by city, sheriff and persons paid by tax expense were not known in detail sufficient to asses a real cost.
Steve Berry's statement there is ALWAYS a Public Disclosure of the Income and expenses of the GT DAYS is a flat out un true statement. It was like pulling teeth and took Council Member Millers insistence that a report was done, and released.
In addition we had disclosed tonight a bit of insight on how the finances are handled in the Finance Department.
We apparently purchased an Air Conditioner, and did not have funds on hand available to pay for the AC units. WE have so much surplus, we have to take a loan for the purchase. A loan that creates interest expense. Not only did we do this, we took the money from one account to pay that account, and now the loan has been funded that account will be refunded its funds. Now in business that would be called kiting of funds. In your house hold budget that would be called robbing Peter to pay Paul. This is not something you do when you have a surplus of funds.
Now should this concern you. YES. WHY, well it should concern you be cause it took place without Council being made aware of the funds transfer from Peter to Paul, over a year of the event of the purchase. THIS is unacceptable or should be.
Who can run for what office: A big question for Council Members:
Citizens: Please Consider running for Recall Seats term of 2 years, Mayor, or Council Seat 4 year terms.
Wednesday, June 21, 2006
GT ELM and FREEWAY INFORMATION:
Some Information on the Freeway Plans and the Future of Grand Terrace Elementary, From "CJUSD FOCUS" May/June 2006 Issue.
Representatives from the Colton Joint Unified School District and the California
Department of Education have discussed a possible future freeway widening project near Grand Terrace Elementary School.
The California Department of Transportation and the San Diego Association of Governments are preparing a study report on the potential expansion of the Barton Road Bridge and possibly the expansion of the 215 freeway.
This project study report does not impact the school site whatsoever. The study is expected to be ready in approximately 30 days [from May 11] and the project is projected to begin in approximately 10 years.
According to Department of Education officials, the school would not necessarily have to go away. The following options could be considered:
Have Cal Trans provide a sound wall along the freeway.
Move portables and expand east. Move portables and expand to two story buildings.
Expand the school site to the east and/or south.
The District will continue to work with the departments of education and transportation as this issue develops. Freeway project coming to Grand Terrace area
Gramp's Comments:
Well, it would be nice if the Study Plan is Available to the Public for Review.
We can understand why the Lion's Club is being offered a year to year lease. GT ELM may need to use that part of the property in the future.
The CJUSD Does not expect to Move the School. So the City Of Grand Terrace's Commercial Zoning of the Property is a Conflict of zoning, or perhaps a purposeful mis-representation. How is this possible you are asking. Well, if a banker looks at the City's Zone Map and sees a large Commercial Zone near the Town Center. A Banker may not question the investment risk of a project as the same as if it was near a school. For Example, if a Hooters, and a Lary Flint Bar went to a bank asking for funds to invest in the Town Center development. The bank would not know there is a School across the street. Funds may be invested, and when it gets to the City Council, it will be a problem all of the sudden.. OF course this is an extreme issue. How about state liquor licenses for on site, and off site consumption... Can they be so close to a school?
Are the drug arrests being elevated to be crimes in a NO DRUG ZONE when they are near the School?
This is why a Map of the area where there is a School should SHOW a SCHOOL. ZONE should BE PUBLIC SCHOOL.
These "Plans" are 10 years off. Traffic should BE PLANNED for that in MIND.
Representatives from the Colton Joint Unified School District and the California
Department of Education have discussed a possible future freeway widening project near Grand Terrace Elementary School.
The California Department of Transportation and the San Diego Association of Governments are preparing a study report on the potential expansion of the Barton Road Bridge and possibly the expansion of the 215 freeway.
This project study report does not impact the school site whatsoever. The study is expected to be ready in approximately 30 days [from May 11] and the project is projected to begin in approximately 10 years.
According to Department of Education officials, the school would not necessarily have to go away. The following options could be considered:
Have Cal Trans provide a sound wall along the freeway.
Move portables and expand east. Move portables and expand to two story buildings.
Expand the school site to the east and/or south.
The District will continue to work with the departments of education and transportation as this issue develops. Freeway project coming to Grand Terrace area
Gramp's Comments:
Well, it would be nice if the Study Plan is Available to the Public for Review.
We can understand why the Lion's Club is being offered a year to year lease. GT ELM may need to use that part of the property in the future.
The CJUSD Does not expect to Move the School. So the City Of Grand Terrace's Commercial Zoning of the Property is a Conflict of zoning, or perhaps a purposeful mis-representation. How is this possible you are asking. Well, if a banker looks at the City's Zone Map and sees a large Commercial Zone near the Town Center. A Banker may not question the investment risk of a project as the same as if it was near a school. For Example, if a Hooters, and a Lary Flint Bar went to a bank asking for funds to invest in the Town Center development. The bank would not know there is a School across the street. Funds may be invested, and when it gets to the City Council, it will be a problem all of the sudden.. OF course this is an extreme issue. How about state liquor licenses for on site, and off site consumption... Can they be so close to a school?
Are the drug arrests being elevated to be crimes in a NO DRUG ZONE when they are near the School?
This is why a Map of the area where there is a School should SHOW a SCHOOL. ZONE should BE PUBLIC SCHOOL.
These "Plans" are 10 years off. Traffic should BE PLANNED for that in MIND.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
