Friday, December 15, 2006

BLUE MOUNTAIN SENIOR VILLAS: and VOUCHERS

Vouchers Show Payments to Corporation for Better Housing, and Other Interesting Payments:
Again, IF the City wanted Informed Citizens the Vouchers and in some cases the Detail would be on the City Web Site.



NOTICE OF A PUBLIC SCOPING MEETING
FOR THE BLUE MOUNTAIN
SENIOR VILLAS


DATE: Thursday, January 4, 2007

PLACE: Council Chambers, 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, CA.

TIME: 6:00 PM

THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE HAS SCHEDULED A PUBLIC SCOPING MEETING AT THE ABOVE TIME AND PLACE. THE PURPOSE OF THE SCOPING MEETING IS TO OBTAIN INPUT REGARDING THE POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS THAT MIGHT BE INCLUDED IN THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE SUBJECT PROJECT.

PROJECT: The proposed development will feature a two-story 120 unit senior facility totaling approximately 100.000 square feet, an approximately 7,000- square foot one-story senior center, and an approximately four-acre passive park with controlled public access during posted hours. The residential facility is designed to provide 103 one-bedroom and 17 two-bedroom units. A total of 146 parking spaces will be provided.

APPLICANT: Corporation for Better Housing

LOCATION: 22627 and 22645 Grand Terrace Road (Approximately 6 acre site southerly side of Grand Terrace Road easterly of Mt. Vernon Ave mainly vacant excepting for the existing City of Grand Terrace senior center and parking lot next to the senior center. The Terrace View Elementary School lies to the immediate east.)

If you have any questions regarding the scoping meeting or this notice, please contact the Community Development Department of the City of Grand Terrace. at (909) 430-2247.

Gary L. Koontz, Community Development Director

Gramps Reports:

The above Message was Retyped so that it is easy to read... The Content is the same as the one Readers sent and said they receive via the mail. No one knows if EVERY one in GT was a recipient or just those who raised concerns in the past.

WE DO know that the City Manager said last night that the City is paying in part for a revised EIR which Judge Wade Required as part of his judgment. However we also know his decision is being appealed. SO Citizens, with concerns your attendance is required at yet another meeting as You MUST restate your concerns at this meeting or the City and CFBH may say the public is satisfied and therefore the EIR should be accepted. THE PUBLIC is not who has to be satisfied. At this point I think it is JUDGE WADE who has to be satisfied that the Environmental Problems are addressed in accordance with Federal, State, and Local Laws, in addition to Public Input. Citizens bring your list of concerns, read them into the record and ask for a notarized copy of their receipt and keep a copy.

But that is just me...

Gramps