From the Email InBox: RECALL a DISTRACTION

Shock and Distraction...

The Council Member's Continued Characterization of the Recall being a Distraction is interesting. HOW has the Recall Distracted the City Manager from running the City? Is it a bother to have to answer questions, not that they have.

Shock, what do you expect the results would be when you conduct or fail to exercise proper oversight of the City's Operations.

Where is the City's Car.
What is the REAL DEBT?
WHY did we by the City Manager, a HOUSE, and 2 CARS? IN ADDITION TO his PAY?

WHERE ARE THE REQUEST for Bids on the OAC, TC, and BMSV?

It was on the INSISTENCE of Council Member Miller that the AC was put to Bid... EVEN that deal had to have funny money transfers to cover the bill.

Where and When were the Public Hearings on the RDA Land Sales, and Transfers?

WHEN THESE THINGS DON'T HAPPEN... THE CITY COUNCIL SHOULD DIRECT THE CITY MANAGER TO MAKE THEM HAPPEN. They did not.

Your 3 minutes are up, please summarize is not dignified... and your comments are duly noted and will never be on the agenda is not dignified.

IF you find the Recall a Excessive Distraction... Perhaps you are not fit for office.

YOU HAVE NOT ENDED THE THREAT OF ED FOR ALL PROPERTY OWNERS... YOU AS COUNCIL MEMBERS COULD REVERSE CITY ORD 187...